1999
DOI: 10.1080/07421222.1999.11518234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Modeling in Data Mining: Interpretive Approach to Bankruptcy Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The discriminant analysis model was the one that had the best performance in the classification of firms in the sample for the third year prior to failure. This level of accuracy is higher than that obtained by Blum (1974), Aly et al (1992), Sung et al (1999), and however lower than Deakin (1972), particularly the sample for the third year prior to failure. Within the models of the artificial intelligence the results obtained with Rough Sets model were generally higher than the neural network model results.…”
Section: Rough Setsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The discriminant analysis model was the one that had the best performance in the classification of firms in the sample for the third year prior to failure. This level of accuracy is higher than that obtained by Blum (1974), Aly et al (1992), Sung et al (1999), and however lower than Deakin (1972), particularly the sample for the third year prior to failure. Within the models of the artificial intelligence the results obtained with Rough Sets model were generally higher than the neural network model results.…”
Section: Rough Setsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…For instance, the most relevant related works can be found in [10], where a Neural Network model obtained a maximum accuracy of 95%; and in [11] where a Decision Tree based model attained an accuracy of 83%. Furthermore, this study considered a large dataset, with a total of 2 288 companies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this study considered a large dataset, with a total of 2 288 companies. In contrast, [10] used a reduced sample, with only 282 organizations, while [11] considered even a smaller number, with 72 companies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision trees allow for easy generation of decision rules, making them ideal for providing insights and explanations to nontechnical users. Decision trees are especially suitable for decision problems that require the generation of human-understandable decision rules based on a mix of classification of categorical and continuous data (Sung et al, 1999). They clearly indicate the importance of individual data to the decision problem, and are therefore useful in reducing the cognitive burden for the decision maker.…”
Section: Knowledge Representation and Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of a particular method in modeling human decisions depends on the conformance of the method with the decision makers' mental model of the decision problem (Sung et al, 1999). Decision trees are a popular decision modeling technique with wide applicability to a variety of business problems.…”
Section: Knowledge Representation and Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%