2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of microbial community structure and nutrient removal from an innovative side-stream enhanced biological phosphorus removal process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria 66 that are responsible for nitrogen removal belong to the Proteobacteria phyla, which explains the enhanced nitrogen removal ability of mature AGS. 88,89 Most Actinobacteria phyla are filamentous Gram-positive bacteria that can trap and immobilize free microbial cells, confirming that filamentous bacteria had positive effects on AGS fixation and structural stabilities. 90 As autotrophic microorganisms, Bacteroidetes can effectively degrade, absorb and utilize macromolecular organics, including proteins, thereby promoting the pollutant removal efficiency of the system.…”
Section: Microbial Community Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Most of the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria 66 that are responsible for nitrogen removal belong to the Proteobacteria phyla, which explains the enhanced nitrogen removal ability of mature AGS. 88,89 Most Actinobacteria phyla are filamentous Gram-positive bacteria that can trap and immobilize free microbial cells, confirming that filamentous bacteria had positive effects on AGS fixation and structural stabilities. 90 As autotrophic microorganisms, Bacteroidetes can effectively degrade, absorb and utilize macromolecular organics, including proteins, thereby promoting the pollutant removal efficiency of the system.…”
Section: Microbial Community Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Significant efforts have been made by scientists worldwide to find ways to lower the phosphate concentration in wastewater (Viglasova et al 2018). Several techniques such as crystallization (Le Corre et al 2009), membrane separation (Arola et al 2021), chemical precipitation (Caravelli et al 2012), biological (Islam et al 2017), and adsorption (Melia et al 2019) have been adopted to remove phosphate in wastewater. The control of phosphate levels using the adsorption method is of increasing interest due to its expected ability to realize P recovery and utilization through desorption to enhance P eutrophication mitigation (Bacelo et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphorus removal by using phosphate-accumulating bacteria is also widely used in the wastewater treatment process, but phosphorus removal is limited by bacteria and wastewater conditions. Furthermore, this approach produces excess sludge containing high concentrations of phosphorus and pollutants, such as heavy metals, which are very difficult and costly to treat 11), 12), 13) . Both methods are widely used these days; however, both of them have disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%