1991
DOI: 10.1021/ma00010a038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of (micro)phase separation during fast, bulk copolymerization: some synchrotron SAXS experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these are a differential scanning calorimeter [2], a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer [3], reaction injection moulding [4], high temperature cells and high pressure cells [S]. A fast temperature jump instrument, enabling the replication of conditions when polymers are injected into a cold mould, is under development.…”
Section: Small and Wide Angle X-ray Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these are a differential scanning calorimeter [2], a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer [3], reaction injection moulding [4], high temperature cells and high pressure cells [S]. A fast temperature jump instrument, enabling the replication of conditions when polymers are injected into a cold mould, is under development.…”
Section: Small and Wide Angle X-ray Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the thermodynamical dissimilarity, the shape memory polyurethanes will separate into hard‐segment and soft‐segment microphases, which play the roles of fixed phase and reversible network chains for the shape memory effect, respectively 4, 16. Many attempts have been made to elucidate the relationship between the structure and shape memory effect of the polyurethanes 14, 15, 20–25. The morphology of phase separation, phase composition, microdomain sizes, phase distribution, and so on were investigated to optimize the molecular design and explore applications of shape memory polyurethanes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] The microphase separation of PUs is greatly influenced by the miscibility of the starting compounds, the structure and the molar mass distribution of the segments, the average block lengths, and the ratio of hard to soft segments. 11 Many methods, for example, polarized optical microscope (POM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), [12][13][14][15][16] atomic force microscopy (AFM), 11,17 differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), 18 Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) 19 and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) 20 etc., have been used to probe the microphase separation. Since the microphase separation and the phase morphology have an important influence on the ultimate properties of the PU copolymers, it is desirable to have a control on the microphase separation in PUs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%