Dynamics of life expectancy and life span equality

Abstract

As people live longer, ages at death are becoming more similar. This dual advance over the last two centuries, a central aim of public health policies, is a major achievement of modern civilization. Some recent exceptions to the joint rise of life expectancy and life span equality, however, make it difficult to determine the underlying causes of this relationship. Here, we develop a unifying framework to study life expectancy and life span equality over time, relying on concepts about the pace and shape of aging. We study the dynamic relationship between life expectancy and life span equality with reliable data from the Human Mortality Database for 49 countries and regions with emphasis on the long time series from Sweden. Our results demonstrate that both changes in life expectancy and life span equality are weighted totals of rates of progress in reducing mortality. This finding holds for three different measures of the variability of life spans. The weights evolve over time and indicate the ages at which reductions in mortality increase life expectancy and life span equality: the more progress at the youngest ages, the tighter the relationship. The link between life expectancy and life span equality is especially strong when life expectancy is less than 70 y. In recent decades, life expectancy and life span equality have occasionally moved in opposite directions due to larger improvements in mortality at older ages or a slowdown in declines in midlife mortality. Saving lives at ages below life expectancy is the key to increasing both life expectancy and life span equality.

Demographic perspectives on the mortality of COVID-19 and other epidemics

“…The rate of increase of all-cause mortality varies from country to country around a central value of about 0.10, higher than the 0.086 for the United States. The smaller rate of increase in the United States is due to unusually high mortality at younger ages, not advantages at older ages, and has been used as an indirect indicator of the inequality of health status of the population ( 5 , 6 ). From this small number of countries, at least, it appears that COVID-19 may be echoing the same factors as all-cause mortality, suggesting that there may be a relationship between the level of health inequality within populations and the age pattern of COVID-19 mortality.…”

Diversification in causes of death in low-mortality countries: emerging patterns and implications

“…BMJ Global Health capture multiple dimensions of health improvement and crises. 17 Ages at death are not the only source of heterogeneity in survival. Patterns in the cause of death structure across countries have long been known to be a key indicator of population well-being.…”

News from the front: Estimation of excess mortality and life expectancy in the major epicenters of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy

“…While measures such as mortality rates are no doubt useful, they need to be collapsed in an index which is universal enough to provide a reliable measure of human life lost. In this regard, life expectancy is significantly related to the overall wellbeing of population and could thus provide a simple, objective and immediate measure of the human casualties associated to unprecedented shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic (16)(17)(18). Furthermore, reliable measures of life expectancy are available for some countries since the nineteenth century.…”