2016
DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2015.1135315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of integrating landscape values in landscape character assessment: the hidden dominance of the objective outsider

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the importance of perception in understanding and representing past landscapes in mappable forms is clear. Yet, this process of interpretation is carried out by experts, and has thus been criticised in the context of Landscape Character Assessment as being dominated by values attributed through 'objective' outsiders (Butler 2016). This criticism, and the relating tension between what are viewed as positivist or oversimplified mappings of landscapes on the one hand, and a lack of pragmatism and contribution to real societal needs to describe and monitor change on the other, has multiple parallels with well-known debates in Geographic Information Science (Pickles 1995, Rundstrom 1995.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the importance of perception in understanding and representing past landscapes in mappable forms is clear. Yet, this process of interpretation is carried out by experts, and has thus been criticised in the context of Landscape Character Assessment as being dominated by values attributed through 'objective' outsiders (Butler 2016). This criticism, and the relating tension between what are viewed as positivist or oversimplified mappings of landscapes on the one hand, and a lack of pragmatism and contribution to real societal needs to describe and monitor change on the other, has multiple parallels with well-known debates in Geographic Information Science (Pickles 1995, Rundstrom 1995.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although diversity was a recognized component of landscape character assessments used for planning in the United Kingdom, these assessments often failed to represent the values of residents, instead being based on the values of an "objective outsider" [96]. However, researchers have explored methods for improving the representation of diverse values in landscape planning using spatially explicit approaches.…”
Section: Supporting Landscape Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Butler (2016), in particular, argues on how landscape character assessment represents a critical point in the framing of landscape values [40].…”
Section: Landscape Value Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values in landscape have been studied by numerous researchers in a variety of contexts [40]: Greg Brown and colleagues have, for example, undertaken extensive work in defining landscape values for participatory mapping [41][42][43]; Michael Jones has developed a categorization of values for addressing conflicts in planning issues [44]; Janet Stephenson has exposed how different forms of assessments take up certain landscape values whilst ignoring others [45]; while others have taken up the question of how professional values differ from those of laypersons professional contra lay person values [46]. Butler (2016), in particular, argues on how landscape character assessment represents a critical point in the framing of landscape values [40].…”
Section: Landscape Value Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%