2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of inelastic deformation of porous rocks and formation of localized compaction zones studied by numerical modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these published research works have been concentrated on crack damage stress (σ cd ) and uniaxial compressive strength (σ c ) of characteristic stress levels during compression (Cai et al, 2004;Katz & Reches, 2004;Andersson, Martin, & Stille, 2009;Palchik, 2009;Stefanov, Chertov, Aidagulov, & Myasnikov, 2011;Nicksiar & Martin, 2012;Xue et al, 2013;Xue et al, 2014). For example, Palchik (2012) evaluated the relationship between stress levels (crack damage stress (σ cd ) and uniaxial compressive strength (σ c ) and strain characteristics (maximum total volumetric strain (Ɛ cd )), axial failure strain (Ɛ af ), porosity (n) and elastic constants (elastic modulus (E)) and Poisson's ratio (v)) with the existence of two different types (type 1 and type 2) of volumetric strain curves and concluded that there is no connection between the types of the volumetric strain curves and the values.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these published research works have been concentrated on crack damage stress (σ cd ) and uniaxial compressive strength (σ c ) of characteristic stress levels during compression (Cai et al, 2004;Katz & Reches, 2004;Andersson, Martin, & Stille, 2009;Palchik, 2009;Stefanov, Chertov, Aidagulov, & Myasnikov, 2011;Nicksiar & Martin, 2012;Xue et al, 2013;Xue et al, 2014). For example, Palchik (2012) evaluated the relationship between stress levels (crack damage stress (σ cd ) and uniaxial compressive strength (σ c ) and strain characteristics (maximum total volumetric strain (Ɛ cd )), axial failure strain (Ɛ af ), porosity (n) and elastic constants (elastic modulus (E)) and Poisson's ratio (v)) with the existence of two different types (type 1 and type 2) of volumetric strain curves and concluded that there is no connection between the types of the volumetric strain curves and the values.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Несмотря на большое количество работ в этой области [35][36][37][38][39], до настоящего вре-мени отсутствует однозначное понимание пределов применения «линейных» моделей пластичности для описания отклика пористых хрупких материалов в стесненных услови-ях. Схожие проблемы имеют место и с критериями разрушения, наиболее популярные из которых (Друкера-Прагера, Кулона-Мора и другие) также записываются в приближении линейной зависимости от первых двух инвариантов тензора напряжений.…”
Section: ключевые словаunclassified
“…Если эффектив-ные прочностные свойства определены, и наряду с упругими характеристиками среды построена по-верхность текучести (упругости), классические упруго-плас тические модели [Stefanov et al, 2011] могут быть привлечены для описания механики трещиновато-по-ристых сланцевых пород.…”
Section: модели деформируемых трещиноватых формацийunclassified