2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of in vitro development of azole resistance in Candida tropicalis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results confirmed that neither ERG11 missense mutation nor overexpression was associated with azole resistance. In accordance with this finding, ERG11 nonsynonymous mutations were not identified after an in vitro induction of fluconazole resistance [12]. On the other hand, several ERG11 missense mutations have recently been confirmed in C. tropicalis to be associated with azole resistance, such as V125A, Y257H and G464S in China [2] and Y132F and S154F in Thailand [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results confirmed that neither ERG11 missense mutation nor overexpression was associated with azole resistance. In accordance with this finding, ERG11 nonsynonymous mutations were not identified after an in vitro induction of fluconazole resistance [12]. On the other hand, several ERG11 missense mutations have recently been confirmed in C. tropicalis to be associated with azole resistance, such as V125A, Y257H and G464S in China [2] and Y132F and S154F in Thailand [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Our results confirmed the significant overexpression of efflux transporters (CDR2 and CDR3), transcription factors (TAC1 and UPC2) and the HMG gene in resistant isolates. The role of CDR2, CDR3, TAC1 and UPC2 overexpression in C. tropicalis in inducing azole resistance has been confirmed by an in vitro induction study of fluconazole resistance [12], and UPC2 overexpression has also been observed in clinical azole-resistant C. tropicalis isolates [13]. Furthermore, CDR2 overexpression has recently been identified in azole-resistant clinical Candida glabrata and C. albicans isolates [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In C. albicans , TAC1 regulates the ABC transporter genes CDR1 and CDR2 , while MRR1 regulates the major facilitator MDR1 [ 10 , 18 , 27 , 28 ]. In the past few years, TAC1 and MRR1 homologs have been described in several other fungal pathogens including Candida parapsilosis , Candida tropicalis and C. auris [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. A TAC1 homolog exists in C. lusitaniae (CLUG_02369) with about 55% similarity to the C. albicans TAC1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downregulation of ALS3, which is associated with adhesion in C. albicans, supported our results of in vitro biofilm eradication. On the contrary, WMR/FLC treatment increased expression levels of ERG11, indicating a possible negative interaction of the combination targeting enzyme CYP51 encoded by ERG11 and leading to azole resistance, but it needs to be pointed out that ERG11 is only one of the genes of the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway (ERG1, ERG2, ERG3, and ERG11) [38]. F. oxysporum VeA and VelB genes, encoding for key regulators of the velvet complex, influence the growth and development of fungal hyphae, conidiation, secondary metabolism, and pathogenicity in both plants and mammals [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%