1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.476348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of glass-forming liquids. V. On the link between molecular dynamics and configurational entropy

Abstract: We compare dielectric relaxation τ(T) data of several low molecular weight glass-forming liquids with the predictions of the Adam–Gibbs theory using experimental data for the configurational entropy Sc(T). Combination of Adam–Gibbs and Vogel–Fulcher equations yields an expression for Sc(T) which can be compared with experimental data. Good agreement is found for a range of temperatures near Tg<T<TB which depends on the fragility of the liquid and on the presence of a β relaxation. For fragile liq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
546
2
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 630 publications
(590 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
35
546
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…16 The relation to the nonergodicity factor is understandable because a low nonergodicity factor means a low level of density fluctuations, which in turn means that one is close to the ideal glass of the Kauzmann paradoxon and expects a high thermodynamic fragility. 17 Very recently, 18 it has been pointed out that there are exceptions from the nonergodicity rule due to a strong influence of secondary relaxations, 19 a reasoning which is parallel to the one in the present work, a second fragility influence which requires not only a knowledge of the fast motion but also of the relaxations themselves.…”
supporting
confidence: 48%
“…16 The relation to the nonergodicity factor is understandable because a low nonergodicity factor means a low level of density fluctuations, which in turn means that one is close to the ideal glass of the Kauzmann paradoxon and expects a high thermodynamic fragility. 17 Very recently, 18 it has been pointed out that there are exceptions from the nonergodicity rule due to a strong influence of secondary relaxations, 19 a reasoning which is parallel to the one in the present work, a second fragility influence which requires not only a knowledge of the fast motion but also of the relaxations themselves.…”
supporting
confidence: 48%
“…We 21 . This is about 25 times smaller than that seen in experiments, where g ¼ 0.8 + 0.2 dyn cm 21 (n ¼ 6) and indicates that our model is not quantitatively capturing the surface tension effects in real tissues.…”
Section: Predictions For Macroscopic Tissue Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, embryonic tissues share several properties with another class of materials called supercooled fluids-they are tightly packed in disordered structures and display elastic behaviour on short timescales and fluid behaviour on long timescales. Supercooled fluids have a viscoelastic relaxation timescale that is controlled by their proximity to a glass transition [18,21] and display glassy dynamics such as anomalous slowing of individual motions and 'caging' behaviour [22,23]. Caging behaviour occurs when the motion of a single element ( particle, atom or cell) is trapped and impeded from motion by a surrounding 'cage' of its nearest neighbours due to the dense packing of the system; only rare, high-energy fluctuations allow the element to be released from the cage and permitted to move a new location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to reference data 23 our m values are at the lower limit, which qualify AP/EG as a very strong glass former, corresponding to a low degree of SCHEME 1: Cluster Model of Amylopectin 30…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%