2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69712-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3). The entire body of obtained experimental data suggests that there is a certain delay time (or induction period [13]) for the appearance of plastic shear nuclei, which act as the centers of fracture nucleation. Since this delay time decreases with increasing maximum compressive stress in the impact loading impulse, it can be suggested that the fracture nucleation takes place in the phases of both compression and subsequent unloading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The entire body of obtained experimental data suggests that there is a certain delay time (or induction period [13]) for the appearance of plastic shear nuclei, which act as the centers of fracture nucleation. Since this delay time decreases with increasing maximum compressive stress in the impact loading impulse, it can be suggested that the fracture nucleation takes place in the phases of both compression and subsequent unloading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incubation time strength condition, see (Morozov and Petrov, 2000;Kashtanov and Petrov, 2007;Kashtanov, Petrov, Pugno and Carpinteri 2008), modified as in (Mikhailov 2003, Section 6.3), has the following form…”
Section: Normalised Equivalent Stress Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state of materials in the nearby zone can be modeled by the Mohr-Coulomb criterion as follows [7,8]. The displacement change of near-region can be gained by using the mass conservation condition: …”
Section: Penetrating Resistancesmentioning
confidence: 99%