2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of crAssphage as a human source tracking marker in potentially faecally polluted environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
52
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…HF183/BacR287 values in the uncovered mesocosm were smaller than all 16 literature value inactivation rate constants whereas in the covered mesocosm, mean values were smaller than seven out of the nine literature value inactivation rate constants ( Fig. 4 ) (ranging from −0.03 to −2.55 d −1 ) ( Ahmed et al., 2014 , 2019 ; Bae and Wuertz, 2015 ; Balleste et al., 2018 , 2019 ; Dick et al., 2010 ; Eichmiller et al., 2014 ; Gilpin et al., 2013 ; Green et al., 2011 ; He et al., 2016 ; Jeanneau et al., 2012 ; Kirs et al., 2016 ; Liang et al., 2012 ; Walters and Field, 2009 ).
Fig.
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…HF183/BacR287 values in the uncovered mesocosm were smaller than all 16 literature value inactivation rate constants whereas in the covered mesocosm, mean values were smaller than seven out of the nine literature value inactivation rate constants ( Fig. 4 ) (ranging from −0.03 to −2.55 d −1 ) ( Ahmed et al., 2014 , 2019 ; Bae and Wuertz, 2015 ; Balleste et al., 2018 , 2019 ; Dick et al., 2010 ; Eichmiller et al., 2014 ; Gilpin et al., 2013 ; Green et al., 2011 ; He et al., 2016 ; Jeanneau et al., 2012 ; Kirs et al., 2016 ; Liang et al., 2012 ; Walters and Field, 2009 ).
Fig.
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…CrAssphage, a recently identified human fecal marker, was detected in all wastewater samples tested, at significantly higher concentrations than human enteric viruses and other indicator viruses. Previous studies also reported that crAssphage was highly abundant in various environmental samples 11,29,33,34,36,39 . Despite its abundance with high concentrations in water samples, several studies reported cross-reactions with feces from different animals 11,29,34,38 , raising questions about its suitability as a human fecal marker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, the sequences of crAssphage variants detected in Europe were found to differ from those in the USA 11 . Both assays revealed the abundance of crAssphage of human origin; however, lower quantities (~3 log 10 lower) were also noted in samples of animal origin 11,29,33,36 , raising questions about the specificity of the assay. Although the appropriateness of crAssphage as a human fecal marker has been tested in many studies 11,29,[32][33][34][35]37,38 , to the best of our knowledge, no studies evaluating crAssphage as an indicator of virus reduction during water treatment processes have yet been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher abundance of bacterial markers than of viral markers was observed in sewage and in human feces (Ahmed et al, 2019a). Although faster decay rates of bacterial than of viral DNA markers have been reported in both freshwater and seawater (Ahmed et al, 2019c; Ballesté et al, 2019; Greaves et al, 2020), the higher abundance of bacterial markers in sewage could be due to the higher excretion rates of gut bacteria than of enteric viruses or to the better adsorption of viruses to particulate matters (Horswell et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CrAssphage (CPQ_056) was reported as up to six orders, expressed as copies/100 mL, in a secondary treated effluent in Louisiana, USA (Tandukar et al, 2020). Another crAssphage marker detected with a crAss-UP/LP assay, reported as four to six orders and expressed as copies/100 ml in WWTP-eff samples from Spain (Ballesté et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%