2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.64.104515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of conversion of supercurrents into normal currents and vice versa

Abstract: The generation and destruction of the supercurrent in a superconductor (S) between two resistive normal (N ) current leads connected to a current source is computed from the source equation for the supercurrent density. This equation relates the gradient of the pair potential's phase to electron and hole wavepackets that create and destroy Cooper pairs in the N/S interfaces. Total Andreev reflection and supercurrent transmission of electrons and holes are coupled together by the phase rigidity of the non-boson… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mutual conversion between normal and supercurrent via Andreev reflection [79] affects the QP density: The dissipative normal current is due to a diffusive motion of the QPs and is thus almost proportional to the gradient of their density, J N ∝ ∇n qp . Consequently, the more normal current is converted into supercurrent along the superconductor, the more the QP density gradient decreases.…”
Section: Andreev Reflection and Qp Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutual conversion between normal and supercurrent via Andreev reflection [79] affects the QP density: The dissipative normal current is due to a diffusive motion of the QPs and is thus almost proportional to the gradient of their density, J N ∝ ∇n qp . Consequently, the more normal current is converted into supercurrent along the superconductor, the more the QP density gradient decreases.…”
Section: Andreev Reflection and Qp Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-evolution of localized wave-packets scattering across a superconductornormal interface was explored long ago. [26][27][28] More recently the analysis has been extended to scattering states in superconductor-device-normal (S-D-N) junctions using the wide-band-limit (WBL) approximation 29 and in superconductor-device-superconductor (S-D-S) junctions by approximating the leads with finite size reservoirs. 30 However, there has been no attempt to calculate the response of S-D-S junctions to TD applied voltages using truly semi-infinite leads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-evolution of localized wave-packets scattering across a superconducting-normal (SN) interface was explored long ago [8,9]. More recently the analysis has been extended to scattering states [10,11,12] in standard quantum transport geometries. However, there has been no attempt to calculate the time-dependent response of a superconductor-normal-superconductor (SNS) junction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%