Dynamics of control on digital platforms

Abstract

Digital platforms are supraorganizational entities that use digital technology to facilitate interactions between diverse actors, leading to novel forms of organisation and accompanying forms of control. The current Information Systems (IS) literature, however, struggles to describe control on digital platforms in a way that does justice to the dynamic character of the phenomenon. Taking this as an opportunity, we follow the enactment of control over time and across parties in a hybrid ethnographic study of the social commerce platform Poshmark. Specifically, we conceptualise the dynamics of control as changes in the means of control-formal or informaland the sources of control-operator or participants-over time. Tracking these conceptual dimensions, we identify the distinct ways control has changed on Poshmark. Synthesising these findings into four dynamics of control, we show that control on digital platforms is rarely static due to aggregate effects arising from the operator and from participant interactions with each other through the digital features deployed on the platform. Based on these insights, our study contributes to the IS literature on control by broadening the conception of control on digital platforms. The theoretical and practical insights generated in this paper thereby lay the foundation for the systematic study of the dynamics of control that are unique to platform environments.

Socio‐technical issues in the platform‐mediated gig economy: A systematic literature review: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

“…Flexibility and autonomy (A31) most often were defined as the amount of freedom a worker has to make decisions about aspects of their work, for example, what they work on, and when and how they work (Wang et al, 2021). It is a primary reason given for people to engage in gig work (Ens et al, 2018). Gig workers consistently commented that flexibility was important to them because it allowed them "to arrange work flexibly on a project basis" (de la Vega et al, 2021) giving them more freedom in their lifestyles (Cram et al, 2020).…”

Strategies for Value Reconfiguration in Online Platforms

“…35 Online platforms also reconfigure value for exerting greater control over the ecosystem or for improved governance. 36 We focus on value reconfiguration from the perspective of strengthening network effects, considering that online platforms create value by enhancing their network effects. 37 Therefore, we conceptualize strategies for value reconfiguration in online platforms depending on which side benefits from such reconfiguration by experiencing enhanced network effects.…”

Exploring the impact of digital work on work–life balance and job performance: a technology affordance perspective

“…Such technologies, including artificial intelligence, big data, cognitive computing, Internet of things, cloud computing, mobile computing, social media and digital platforms like Microsoft Teams and Zoom, have reshaped how work is designed, performed and managed in organizations (Ellder, 2019;De et al, 2020). This leads to the development of emerging digital work environments in which the work arrangement between organizations and individuals is becoming more contingent, flexible and distributed (Nakrosiene et al, 2019;Ens et al, 2018;Wibowo et al, 2022).…”