2018
DOI: 10.3126/npj.v18i17.26375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of contraceptive use among young women in Nepal

Abstract: This paper examines the dynamics of contraceptive use of currently married young women (age 15-24) in Nepal by analyzing the trends and differentials in contraceptive use, the changes in method mix and the determinants of contraceptive use by selected socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. The reasons of non-use of contraception are also assessed. Data from the three rounds of nationally representative Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) 2001, 2006 and 2011 are used. Currently married women aged… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is similar to other studies (Appiah et al, 2020;Asiimwe et al, 2014). However, studies in Nepal (Kafle, 2018) and Ethiopia (Worku et al, 2014) found that young women's wealth status was significantly associated with their use of contraception.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is similar to other studies (Appiah et al, 2020;Asiimwe et al, 2014). However, studies in Nepal (Kafle, 2018) and Ethiopia (Worku et al, 2014) found that young women's wealth status was significantly associated with their use of contraception.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is found from the current study that women who had one or two living children and three or higher living children had a higher likelihood to use modern contraceptives compared to those women at parity zero. Studies conducted in Nepal (Kafle, 2018), Jordan (Almalik, Mosleh, & Almasarweh, 2018), and Ghana (Appiah, Seidu, Ahinkorah, Baatiema, & Ameyaw, 2020) are in line with this finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%