2002
DOI: 10.1139/x02-131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of coarse woody debris following gap harvesting in the Acadian forest of central Maine, U.S.A.

Abstract: We examined the dynamics of down coarse woody debris (CWD) under an expanding-gap harvesting system in the Acadian forest of Maine. Gap harvesting treatments included 20% basal area removal, 10% basal area removal, and a control. We compared volume, biomass, diameter-class, and decay-class distributions of CWD in permanent plots before and 3 years after harvest. We also determined wood density and moisture content by species and decay class. Mean pre-harvest CWD volume was 108.9 m3/ha, and biomass was 23.22 Mg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
104
3
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(79 reference statements)
9
104
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, dead wood was classified into a total of four decomposition-level categories (BMELV 2010;BMVEL 2001). The biomass of the dead wood stocks for the various relevant decomposition classes, was determined with the wood density figures pursuant to Fraver et al (2002) for conifers, and with the wood density figures pursuant to Müller-Using & Bartsch (2009) for both deciduous tree species (other than oak) and oak tree species. An overview of the biomass-expansion factors is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, dead wood was classified into a total of four decomposition-level categories (BMELV 2010;BMVEL 2001). The biomass of the dead wood stocks for the various relevant decomposition classes, was determined with the wood density figures pursuant to Fraver et al (2002) for conifers, and with the wood density figures pursuant to Müller-Using & Bartsch (2009) for both deciduous tree species (other than oak) and oak tree species. An overview of the biomass-expansion factors is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several threatened species of wood-decay fungi depend on both a stand-and landscape-level supply of deadwood (Gu et al 2002, Edman et al 2004a, 2004b, Jöns-son et al 2008. To date, however, most studies of CWD dynamics have addressed only stand-level patterns (e.g., Jonsson 2000, Fraver et al 2002, Edman et al 2007, Aakala et al 2009); much less attention has been directed toward CWD dynamics at larger scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decay classification was based on Fraver et al [66] and included decay class 1 (wood was sound, bark was intact, small to medium branches were still present); decay class 2 (wood was sound to slightly rotten, bark maybe attached, large branch stubs were present, log maintained round shape); decay class 3 (wood was substantially rotten, wood texture was moist, bark was barely attached, bole was oval shaped and partially buried in duff); decay class 4 (wood was rotten, branch stubs rotted, bark was detached, log was oval shaped and largely buried by duff).…”
Section: Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%