2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02462-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Cell Death After Conventional IRE and H-FIRE Treatments

Abstract: High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) has emerged as an alternative to conventional irreversible electroporation (IRE) to overcome the issues associated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation that appear in IRE treatments. In H-FIRE, the monopolar pulses typically used in IRE are replaced with bursts of short bipolar pulses. Currently, very little is known regarding how the use of a different waveform affects the cell death dynamics and mechanisms. In this study, human pancreatic adenocarcino… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be reasonable to hypothesize that different tissues and cell types, both healthy and malignant, have different responses to electroporation-based technologies and may require altering dosing, treatment parameters, or co-therapies to obtain optimal effects. In fact, a recent study on pancreatic cancer shows differences in cell death mechanisms initiated by IRE and HFIRE with similar parameters (104). Further investigation into these cell death mechanisms among electroporation-based technologies may help tailor these treatments for personalized medicine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It would be reasonable to hypothesize that different tissues and cell types, both healthy and malignant, have different responses to electroporation-based technologies and may require altering dosing, treatment parameters, or co-therapies to obtain optimal effects. In fact, a recent study on pancreatic cancer shows differences in cell death mechanisms initiated by IRE and HFIRE with similar parameters (104). Further investigation into these cell death mechanisms among electroporation-based technologies may help tailor these treatments for personalized medicine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While directly near the electrodes may be temperature dependent, cell death becomes temperature independent in other regions based on minimum heating effects seen in vitro at comparable electric field magnitudes (7). Multiple studies argued that there may be more than one type of cell death mechanism at play, from necrotic cell death to apoptotic-like non-apoptotic cell death (17,(102)(103)(104). These responses could come from differing tissues being predisposed to specific types FIGURE 2 | Regions of cell death within a typical IRE treatment zone vary spatially.…”
Section: Irreversible Electroporation (Ire)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a non-thermal ablated lesion was caused without evident coagulation necrosis on gross inspection [19,20]. The cell viability, gross pathology, and histopathology show dynamic change post-EP, which varies in different tissues [21]. In general, the tissue damage process caused by EP ends within 24 h, then the repair procedure begins on days 3 to 7 post-EP and is completed within 28 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They demonstrated that the H-FIRE pulse waveforms at 4000 V/cm did not cause muscle contractions in a rat model, nor did they cause a significant temperature increase. Since then, much work has been done to further explore the use of H-FIRE with various pulse waveforms by computational [3,5], in vitro [6][7][8], ex vivo [9][10][11], and in vivo [12][13][14][15] studies. Sano et al [6] looked at the use of H-FIRE pulse waveforms with a sub-microsecond pulse width (i.e., 0.25-2-0.25 and 0.5-2-0.5) in a pancreatic tumor cell in vitro cell suspension model and showed this modality was effective at causing cell death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%