Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of bacterial communities before and after distribution in a full-scale drinking water network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
61
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
61
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with other studies (Pinto et al., ; Prest et al., ; Wu et al., ) phyla such as Proteobacteria , Actinobacteria , Firmicutes , Cyanobacteria , Bacteroidetes , and Nitrospirae were commonly found in the water samples investigated. As also observed in this study, several studies have identified Proteobacteria as the most abundant phylum in aquatic environments within the drinking water production industry (Bautista‐de los Santos et al., ; El‐Chakhtoura et al., ; Liu et al., ; Vaz‐Moreira, Nunes, & Manaia, ; Zanacic, McMartin, & Stavrinides, ). It is clear from our results that the bacterial community composition of surface water strongly differs from those of the other water types studied.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In line with other studies (Pinto et al., ; Prest et al., ; Wu et al., ) phyla such as Proteobacteria , Actinobacteria , Firmicutes , Cyanobacteria , Bacteroidetes , and Nitrospirae were commonly found in the water samples investigated. As also observed in this study, several studies have identified Proteobacteria as the most abundant phylum in aquatic environments within the drinking water production industry (Bautista‐de los Santos et al., ; El‐Chakhtoura et al., ; Liu et al., ; Vaz‐Moreira, Nunes, & Manaia, ; Zanacic, McMartin, & Stavrinides, ). It is clear from our results that the bacterial community composition of surface water strongly differs from those of the other water types studied.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Similar observations were reported in the literature [23]. However, Proteobacteria are among the most abundant phyla of tap water microbiome in many studies [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Biodiversity Of Bacteria Forming Biofilm In Cold-and Hot-tapsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These findings are in contrast with the results of Grabińska-Łoniewska et al [20] but are consistent with the previous study of Wroclaw tap water (data not published). Furthermore, Firmicutes only accounted for around 2% of phyla classification in treatment plant outlet and around 1.1% in a drinking water distribution network in The Netherlands, determined using a pyrosequencing analysis of 16S rRNA gene [21]. Nevertheless, in a huge study of the diversity of microorganisms in drinking water systems of 17 cities in United States, the Bacillus spp.…”
Section: Biodiversity Of Bacteria Forming Biofilm In Cold-and Hot-tapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This number was also approximately one order of magnitude higher than the maximum number of OTUs reported in prior drinking water microbiota surveys (6488 in Lautenschlager et al , 2013; Pinto et al , 2014; El-Chakhtoura et al , 2015; Lührig et al , 2015; Proctor and Hammes, 2015), which have focused exclusively on cold water. We found that elevated water heater temperature drove significant change with respect to both the phylogenetic composition and predicted functions of the microbiota at the tap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%