2017
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of auditory cortical activity during behavioural engagement and auditory perception

Abstract: Behavioural engagement can enhance sensory perception. However, the neuronal mechanisms by which behavioural states affect stimulus perception remain poorly understood. Here we record from single units in auditory cortex of rats performing a self-initiated go/no-go auditory task. Self-initiation transforms cortical tuning curves and bidirectionally modulates stimulus-evoked activity patterns and improves auditory detection and recognition. Trial self-initiation decreases the rate of spontaneous activity in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
99
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(86 reference statements)
9
99
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunohistochemistry was performed on the mounted sections as previously described (41,42). Sections were blocked in 5% goat serum solution for an hour at room temperature or for 14 hours at 4º C. A solution of the appropriate primary antibodies was diluted in 1% goat serum and 0.01% Triton X solution and then applied for 24 hours at 4º C. We used a…”
Section: Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunohistochemistry was performed on the mounted sections as previously described (41,42). Sections were blocked in 5% goat serum solution for an hour at room temperature or for 14 hours at 4º C. A solution of the appropriate primary antibodies was diluted in 1% goat serum and 0.01% Triton X solution and then applied for 24 hours at 4º C. We used a…”
Section: Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed in vivo 2-photon imaging experiments in awake mice of C57 strain as well as CBA background (CBAxC57 F1) and quantified the functional responses across L2/3 and L4 of A1. We focused on young adult animals (~2-3 months old) which is the age frequently used in functional studies, especially those involving mouse behavior (Bandyopadhyay et al, 2010;Rothschild et al, 2010;Carcea et al, 2017;Guo et al, 2017;Kuchibhotla et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Meng et al, 2017;Resnik and Polley, 2017;Francis et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2019;Tischbirek et al, 2019). To compare strains we imaged the mid-frequency region of A1 (4-16kHz) which is also where mice are most sensitive to sound (Zheng et al, 1999).We find that A1 of CBA mice contains more neurons tuned to high frequencies and a higher number of significant tone-responses overall, including a higher proportion of off-responses (Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attenuation of sound-evoked activity may decrease the sensitivity to sounds, as supported by poorer performance on tone detection tasks during locomotion (McGinley et al, 2015;). On the other hand, the observed increase in frequency selectivity in IC neurons may improve frequency discrimination (Aizenberg et al, 2015;Carcea et al, 2017;Guo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Modulation Of Neural Activity By Locomotion In the Icmentioning
confidence: 99%