Dynamics of a project through Intermediary Objects of Design (IODs): A sensemaking perspective

Papadimitriou, Κonstantina; Pellegrin, Claude

doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.002

Cited by 25 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A similar perspective is proposed by Papadimitriou and Pellegrin (2007) who discuss Intermediary Objects of Design (IODs). They argue that objects such as designs and prototypes are interim tangible objects, which are representative of the eventual deliverables.…”

Section: Boundary Objects In Project Management (Pm)mentioning

confidence: 81%

Seeing the bigger picture: Conditions that influence effective engagement of project executives with visuals

Hoorn

2020

International Journal of Project Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Boundary Objects In Project Management (Pm)mentioning

confidence: 81%

Seeing the bigger picture: Conditions that influence effective engagement of project executives with visuals

Hoorn

2020

International Journal of Project Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…They discuss the role of design artefacts using the concept of boundary objects (Star and Griesemer 1989), arguing that design objects, such as sketches, are understood differently by the different participants and have a crucial impact on the co-design process. This interpretative flexibility is one of the main aspects of boundary objects (Star 2010) and has led to derivatives such as Vinck and Jeantet's (1995) concept of intermediary objects that are 'snapshots' of a project in terms of tangible objects, such as sketches or documents, at given moments in the design trajectory (Papadimitriou and Pellegrin 2007). Using the concept of intermediary objects, Boujut and Blanco (2003) Downloaded by [University of Colorado -Health Science Library] at 23:58 09 April 2015 J.A.…”

Section: Collaboration In Co-design: Perspectives and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysing design suggestions and use of resources in co-design of educational software: A case study

Dolonen

Ludvigsen

2013

CoDesign

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This naturalistic study focuses on how the co-design of educational software is an activity mediated by and through communicative resources. The aim is to identify how design suggestions and the use of resources emerge in co-design. This study contributes to the growing interest in understanding aspects of collaboration in design. To understand the phenomenon of collaboration in design, we apply interaction analysis, dialogism and the sociocultural perspective to show which resources the participants use and how they negotiate design suggestions. We argue that such understanding is only visible through detailed analysis of naturally occurring co-design activities. We find that the design trajectory varies in how the participants orient themselves to each other and in relation to the design artefacts. Tensions make visible which communicative resources are sensitive to what the participants interpret as relevant in the context of their institutional norms and values. Their different positions must be negotiated. Together, these aspects orient the design and mediate the emerging consensus and design artefact.

show abstract

“…Diversas propostas de tipologia para objetos de fronteira têm sido apresentadas na literatura (CARLILE, 2002;TOIKKA;ARAMO-IMMONEN, 2013;PAPADIMITRIOU;PELLEGRIN, 2007). Estudos como esses fornecem aspectos relevantes a serem considerados para uma proposta classificatória abrangente, conforme nosso objetivo, e serão discutidos a seguir.…”

Section: Trabalhos Relacionados: Tipologias Para Objetos De Fronteiraunclassified

Classificação de objetos de fronteira na organização do conhecimento e o papel das ontologias | Classification of frontier objects in the knowledge organization and the role of ontologies

Campos

2018

Liinc Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO Objetos de fronteira (boundary objects) têm sido abordados na área da ciência da informação como objetos (concretos ou abstratos) usados como pontes de contato entre comunidades ou grupos, facilitando a sua comunicação e entendimento.Vários tipos de objetos de fronteira são exemplificados na literatura, cada qual desempenhando um papel específico, dentro do papel mais geral, de articulação de compreensão e troca de conhecimento entre comunidades que partilham algum objetivo em comum. Entretanto, essa diferenciação de papeis nem sempre é clara, dificultando o entendimento da finalidade e utilidade de tais instrumentos de acordo com suas características e com o problema que visam resolver. Especialmente quando um mesmo objeto de fronteira pode assumir mais de um papel de acordo com o seu uso, como é o caso das ontologias.O objetivo deste trabalho é investigar diferentes tipos de objetos de fronteira, a partir de uma revisão na literatura, e propor uma categorização com base em suas características e finalidades, de modo a situar os diferentes papéis que as ontologias podem assumir como objetos de fronteira, discutindo seu uso como tal. Como resultado, apresentamos um mapa conceitual de tipos de objetos de fronteira e uma exemplificação do papel das ontologias de acordo com o seu uso nesse contextoPalavras-chave: Objetos de Fronteira; Organização do Conhecimento; Ontologias.ABSTRACT Boundary objects have been approached in the area of Information Science as objects (concrete or abstract) used as bridges of contact between communities or groups, facilitating their communication and understanding. Several types of boundary objects are exemplified in the literature, each playing a specific role within the more general role of articulating understanding and knowledge exchange among communities that share some common goal. However, this differentiation of roles is not always clear, making it difficult to understand the purpose and utility of such instruments according to their characteristics and the problem they are intended to solve. Especially when the same boundary object can assume more than a role according to its use, as is the case of ontologies. The objective of this work is to investigate different types of frontier objects, based on a literature review, and to propose a categorization based on its characteristics and purposes. From this categorization, it is proposed to situate the different roles that ontologies can assume as border objects, discussing their use as such. As a result, we present a conceptual map of boundary object types and an exemplification of the role of ontologies according to their use in this context.Keywords: Boundary Objects; Knowledge Organization; Ontologies.

show abstract

Dynamics of a project through Intermediary Objects of Design (IODs): A sensemaking perspective

Cited by 25 publications

References 28 publications

Seeing the bigger picture: Conditions that influence effective engagement of project executives with visuals

Seeing the bigger picture: Conditions that influence effective engagement of project executives with visuals

Analysing design suggestions and use of resources in co-design of educational software: A case study

Classificação de objetos de fronteira na organização do conhecimento e o papel das ontologias | Classification of frontier objects in the knowledge organization and the role of ontologies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About