1982
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.48.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of a Potential Barrier Formed on the Tail of a Moving Double Layer in a Collisionless Plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, experimental regimes have fallen into two main categories, namely, double or triple plasma devices, which are voltage driven [15,16], and current driven discharges with an abrupt change in diameter [17], where the common thread was the requirement of an artificially induced current to drive the DL. However, by carefully adjusting the potentials on immersed grids, it has been shown that it is the flow of ions and electrons rather than the applied potentials in triple plasma devices which create the DL [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, experimental regimes have fallen into two main categories, namely, double or triple plasma devices, which are voltage driven [15,16], and current driven discharges with an abrupt change in diameter [17], where the common thread was the requirement of an artificially induced current to drive the DL. However, by carefully adjusting the potentials on immersed grids, it has been shown that it is the flow of ions and electrons rather than the applied potentials in triple plasma devices which create the DL [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent laboratory experiments on double layers also indicate a similar structure (Iizuka et al, 1982). The condition for producing such a potential structure is not clear, although computer simulations by Wagner (1980) suggest strong wave trapping due to the Buneman instability.…”
Section: B Type 2 Counterstreaming Electronsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In potential relaxation oscillations the axial propagation of a double layer was observed which does not occur in the present case. The current-limiting potential structure builds up near the electrode but does not propagate axially making the relaxation time independent of the machine length [26,27]. In the low-beta Q-machine plasmas electromagnetic phenomena are negligible but in the present EMHD regime the transient current pulses excite whistler wave packets which propagate along B 0 but do not determine the pulse repetition time.…”
Section: Current Relaxation Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 95%