2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of a Benzo[a]pyrene-derived Guanine DNA Lesion in TGT and CGC Sequence Contexts: Enhanced Mobility in TGT Explains Conformational Heterogeneity, Flexible Bending, and Greater Susceptibility to Nucleotide Excision Repair

Abstract: The nucleotide excision repair (NER) machinery excises a variety of bulky DNA lesions, but with varying efficiencies. The structural features of the DNA lesions that govern these differences are not well understood. An intriguing model system for studying structure-function relationships in NER is the major adduct derived from the reaction of the highly tumorigenic metabolite of benzo [a]pyrene, (+)-anti-benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide, with the exocyclic amino group of guanine ((+)-trans-anti-[BP]-N 2 -dG, or G*)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(116 reference statements)
4
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In NER experiments using prokaryotic UvrA Bca B Bca C Tma proteins, the ratio was reported to be 2.3 ± 0.3 at 37 °C and 1.7 ± 0.4 at 55 °C. This loss of discrimination at the higher temperature is believed be due to the increased dynamic conformational flexibility at the lesion site at 55 °C; this has a greater impact in the more rigid CG 6 C sequence context of duplex III than on the more flexible TG 6 T sequence context of duplex IV [59]. In the case of E. coli UvrA E.coli UvrB E.coli UvrC E.coli , however, the ratio at 37 °C was smaller (1.7 ± 0.1) in E. coli UvrABC incision experiments [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In NER experiments using prokaryotic UvrA Bca B Bca C Tma proteins, the ratio was reported to be 2.3 ± 0.3 at 37 °C and 1.7 ± 0.4 at 55 °C. This loss of discrimination at the higher temperature is believed be due to the increased dynamic conformational flexibility at the lesion site at 55 °C; this has a greater impact in the more rigid CG 6 C sequence context of duplex III than on the more flexible TG 6 T sequence context of duplex IV [59]. In the case of E. coli UvrA E.coli UvrB E.coli UvrC E.coli , however, the ratio at 37 °C was smaller (1.7 ± 0.1) in E. coli UvrABC incision experiments [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted on the effects of nearest-neighbor and distantneighbor sequences on the repair rate of BPDE-dG. The data have been interpreted within the context of structural deformity and duplex backbone flexibility caused by the adduct in various sequence contexts, and some general rules have been derived (24)(25)(26)(27). Although these pioneering studies have been quite useful, some of the rules were derived from the excision rates of the BPDE-dG adduct from in vitro experiments with human cellfree extracts and oligonucleotide duplexes 135 bp in length (28).…”
Section: Length Distribution and Nucleotide Frequency Analysis Of Excmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few in vitro studies that also suggest that cleavage is not completely sequence-independent; for example, cleavage of an identical sequence where an acetylaminofluorene adduct positioned at three distinct guanines led to significant variation in incision efficiency (52). Similar differences were found for benzo[a]pyrenyl-guanine lesions placed at various positions (53,54). In addition de Laat et al (32) presented evidence for sequence specificity by showing that splayed arm substrates with distinct sequence composition around the junction were cleaved at distinct positions in the stem sequence, arguing that the incision position is somewhat dictated by the DNA sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This well orchestrated cleavage process (61-63) results in the removal of 24 -32 nucleotides both in vitro and in vivo. The substantial variation in both cleavage position with respect to the damage and the length of the removed sequence (5, 64) suggests some heterogeneity in the cleavage mechanism, which is underscored by flanking sequence-dependent differences in cleavage efficiency in vitro (43,(52)(53)(54)(55) and in vivo (56).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%