2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-017-0546-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics and Control of a 6-dof Cable-driven Parallel Robot with Visco-elastic Cables in Presence of Measurement Noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, a standard mathematical model of the cable behavior does not exist that compensates the cable uncertainties including elongation, degradation, creep, and so on. In this study, we assume that the cable behavior makes nongeometric errors [ 23 ], and thus, we conducted the cable deformation experiments and derived the surface fitting models of the cable elongation in terms of the cable length and tensions. From the MATLAB surface fitting results, we obtained the fifth-order polynomial equation as the following: …”
Section: Models To Compensate Uncertainties Of the Cable-driven Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a standard mathematical model of the cable behavior does not exist that compensates the cable uncertainties including elongation, degradation, creep, and so on. In this study, we assume that the cable behavior makes nongeometric errors [ 23 ], and thus, we conducted the cable deformation experiments and derived the surface fitting models of the cable elongation in terms of the cable length and tensions. From the MATLAB surface fitting results, we obtained the fifth-order polynomial equation as the following: …”
Section: Models To Compensate Uncertainties Of the Cable-driven Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controllers were widely used in the control of CDPRs. 914 The control of CDPRs based on optimal controllers 15,16 as well as fuzzy controllers 17 was also discussed by researchers. It was shown that adaptive controllers have a reliable performance in the control of CDPRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with uncertainties of CDPRs, the robustness of controllers was studied. 15,19,24,25 The control of CDPRs with position-controlled actuators was discussed in the study by Begey et al 26 All the above-mentioned control strategies 926 assume the Jacobians 27 of the CDPRs can be determined in the control process. In other words, these control strategies rely on the Jacobians of the CDPRs and thus, are not applicable to the control of CDPRs with unknown Jacobians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective utilizations of flexible elements into the robotic locomotion have attracted significant interests in robotics and control communities. The motivations are diverse, for instance, to build up safer interactions with humans [1,2], to improve the model accuracy of the robotic systems [3,4], to achieve higher level of manoeuvrability, high bandwidth mechanical compliance, flexibility, agility, controllability, adaptability, and efficacy in fulfilling large scope of tasks in unstructured and hazardous environment [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) and(6), and letting ( ) = ( ), ( ) = ( ), ( ) = ( ), ( ) = ̇( ), we have the state-space representations…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%