2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21082713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics, a Powerful Component of Current and Future in Silico Approaches for Protein Design and Engineering

Abstract: Computational prediction has become an indispensable aid in the processes of engineering and designing proteins for various biotechnological applications. With the tremendous progress in more powerful computer hardware and more efficient algorithms, some of in silico tools and methods have started to apply the more realistic description of proteins as their conformational ensembles, making protein dynamics an integral part of their prediction workflows. To help protein engineers to harness benefits of consider… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
(187 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it has been suggested that the increased flexibility in the regions that are involved in the catalytically relevant motions can reduce the activation enthalpy, such regions in pSHMT still remain to be identified in future work. Interestingly, it has been found that the increased protein surface flexibility in several cold-adapted enzymes is directly related to the reduced activation enthalpy compared to the warm-active counterparts [ 34 , 36 , 37 ], implying that the surface mobility could act to modulate the conformational changes occurring during catalysis through the interaction network and correlated motions [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. For pSHMT, it is possible that the positive effect (i.e., reduced activation enthalpy) arising from the considerably increased flexibility in the surface loops ( Figure 3 ) could over-counteract the negative effect (i.e., reduced activation entropy) arising from the increased flexibility in the regions not involved in the catalytic motions, thus resulting in a lower activation free energy and explaining its increased catalytic activity compared to mSHMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been suggested that the increased flexibility in the regions that are involved in the catalytically relevant motions can reduce the activation enthalpy, such regions in pSHMT still remain to be identified in future work. Interestingly, it has been found that the increased protein surface flexibility in several cold-adapted enzymes is directly related to the reduced activation enthalpy compared to the warm-active counterparts [ 34 , 36 , 37 ], implying that the surface mobility could act to modulate the conformational changes occurring during catalysis through the interaction network and correlated motions [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. For pSHMT, it is possible that the positive effect (i.e., reduced activation enthalpy) arising from the considerably increased flexibility in the surface loops ( Figure 3 ) could over-counteract the negative effect (i.e., reduced activation entropy) arising from the increased flexibility in the regions not involved in the catalytic motions, thus resulting in a lower activation free energy and explaining its increased catalytic activity compared to mSHMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the analysis of static multimeric models gave an adequate representation of the important interactions within the structures, proteins often have a number of conformations in vivo, thus necessitating their simulation and analyses [101]. MD simulations allowed sampling of a wide range of these conformations, as shown by the root mean square deviation (RMSD) Kernel density estimation (KDE) plots in Figure 4.…”
Section: Dynamic Characterization Of the Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein design offers an infinite possibility of novel protein structures and functionalities with diverse application in the areas of novel therapeutics, diagnostics, sensors, materials, etc. One common approach is computational protein design targeting enzyme engineering, protein specificity, cellular pathway control, and higher‐order protein assembly 1–6 . However, as a single step, computational design has the challenging requirement of solving at least three design problems simultaneously, including (a) protein foldability (i.e., folding kinetics requirements), (b) protein stability (i.e., thermodynamic requirements), and (c) the accommodation of specific function (with potential structural dynamics requirements).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%