2011
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamically changing effects of corticosteroids on human hippocampal and prefrontal processing

Abstract: Stress has a powerful impact on memory. Corticosteroids, released in response to stress, are thought to mediate, at least in part, these effects by affecting neuronal plasticity in brain regions involved in memory formation, including the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Animal studies have delineated aspects of the underlying physiological mechanisms, revealing rapid, nongenomic effects facilitating synaptic plasticity, followed several hours later by a gene-mediated suppression of this plasticity. Here, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
5
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, despite overall poorer memory performance for backgrounds presented with negative (vs. neutral) content, there was greater perceptual processing in those cases where participants managed to successfully retrieve negative contexts, but only following sleep. The fact that group differences were revealed only in neural activity and not in behavior suggests that neural markers may be more sensitive to the effects of study history and sleep than behavioral outcomes, which is consistent with work in many domains that find a similar pattern of results (neural effects in absence of behavioral effects; e.g., Henckens et al, 2012;Van Stegeren, Roozendaal, Kindt, Wolf, & Joëls, 2010). Importantly, because there were no behavioral group differences, the number of correctly recognized objects did not differ across groups, and it is unlikely that memory trace strength differed (as this should have resulted in behavioral group differences).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Nevertheless, despite overall poorer memory performance for backgrounds presented with negative (vs. neutral) content, there was greater perceptual processing in those cases where participants managed to successfully retrieve negative contexts, but only following sleep. The fact that group differences were revealed only in neural activity and not in behavior suggests that neural markers may be more sensitive to the effects of study history and sleep than behavioral outcomes, which is consistent with work in many domains that find a similar pattern of results (neural effects in absence of behavioral effects; e.g., Henckens et al, 2012;Van Stegeren, Roozendaal, Kindt, Wolf, & Joëls, 2010). Importantly, because there were no behavioral group differences, the number of correctly recognized objects did not differ across groups, and it is unlikely that memory trace strength differed (as this should have resulted in behavioral group differences).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…One recent study directly tested rapid versus slow corticosteroid effects on neural processing associated with memory formation in men (Henckens et al, 2012). Although no behavioral effects of cortisol were found, cortisol’s slow effects reduced prefrontal and hippocampal responses, while no significant rapid effects of cortisol were observed.…”
Section: Situational Factors Moderate Cortisol’s Effects On Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging evidence also suggests abnormalities in neurochemical and hormone production and responsiveness, although this has yet to be examined in late preterm children. For example, early preterm birth is associated with long-term alterations in cortisol secretion and stress responsiveness (Grunau et al, 2007;Fernandez et al, 2008;Sullivan et al, 2008), and exposure of extremely preterm infants to stressors in the neonatal intensive care unit is associated with regional changes in brain size and functional connectivity (Smith et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%