2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamically adjustable foot-ground contact model to estimate ground reaction force during walking and running

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ground reaction force, the peaks of forces in sagittal plane and frontal plane occurred at 20%, 43% and 73% of stance phase cycle which were consist with the finding of Lundgren, Giakas and Jung [28,30,31]. In Giakas's research [30], sagittal plane ground reaction force was within the range of 1.06~1.17 BW while the result of this paper was within 1.1~1.14 BW.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For ground reaction force, the peaks of forces in sagittal plane and frontal plane occurred at 20%, 43% and 73% of stance phase cycle which were consist with the finding of Lundgren, Giakas and Jung [28,30,31]. In Giakas's research [30], sagittal plane ground reaction force was within the range of 1.06~1.17 BW while the result of this paper was within 1.1~1.14 BW.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The curve of GRF had two peaks in the stance phase when running at low speed, corresponding to heel strike and toe off. With increasing the speed, the GRF peak of heel strike will disappear [ 30 ]. A relatively high speed was applied in the treadmill countermeasure, which may lead to non-heel-striking running.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lateral trunk sway will be calculated using trunk sway in relation to the pelvis [ 45 ]. Peak GRF during gait will be calculated and normalized to body weight [ 46 , 47 ]. Given that GRF and kinematics are velocity-dependent, walking parameters will be collected at two walking velocities, self-selected comfortable velocity and a standard velocity (1.5 m/s) [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%