Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2017.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical tuning for MPC using population games: A water supply network application

Abstract: Model predictive control (MPC) is a suitable strategy for the control of large-scale systems that have multiple design requirements, e.g., multiple physical and operational constraints. Besides, an MPC controller is able to deal with multiple control objectives considering them within the cost function, which implies to determine a proper prioritization for each of the objectives. Furthermore, when the system has time-varying parameters and/or disturbances, the appropriate prioritization might vary along the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An advantage of model predictive control (MPC) compared to other control techniques relies on its capability to deal with physical and operational constraints. Hence, this optimal control strategy has been successfully applied in different industrial applications, e.g., in networked large-scale systems [1], hydro-thermal power systems [2], wind farms [3], and drinking water system [4]. Nonetheless, if the goal is controlling large-scale systems, the big number of variables involved in the underlying optimization problem of MPC is an issue that limits the implementation of this controller, especially for satisfying sampling time constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of model predictive control (MPC) compared to other control techniques relies on its capability to deal with physical and operational constraints. Hence, this optimal control strategy has been successfully applied in different industrial applications, e.g., in networked large-scale systems [1], hydro-thermal power systems [2], wind farms [3], and drinking water system [4]. Nonetheless, if the goal is controlling large-scale systems, the big number of variables involved in the underlying optimization problem of MPC is an issue that limits the implementation of this controller, especially for satisfying sampling time constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal system partitioning P ⋆ is the one presented in Figure 9(a). It is important to highlight that the total number of information-sharing links in order to compute the optimal control input according to problem (28) is (1 ⊺ n A1 n ) 2 = 361. Furthermore, the optimal system partitioning P ⋆ has 13 links among partitions, which is the 3.6% of the total number of information-sharing links, representing reduced communication dependence among different partitions, which is desired for the design of non-centralized controllers.…”
Section: Case Study Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two terms define the IAE of the torque and BZT (output variables), as in Equations (8) and (9). The cumulative rate change of input variables (feed and fuel flow rate), often referred to as energy loss as described by Equations (10) and (11), are also considered. Energy loss is determined with a signed accumulation of deviation of manipulation variable from its nominal value.…”
Section: Formulation Of Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%