Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1996
DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712253012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical structure functions in a four‐dimensional variational assimilation: A case study

Abstract: This paper contributes to the understanding of the structure functions used implicitly in the four-dimensional variational assimilation (4D-Var) developed at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts in the last few years. The theoretical equivalence between 4D-Var and the Kalman filter allows us to interpret (after normalization by the error standard deviations) the analysis increments produced by one single observation as the structure functions used implicitly in 4D-Var. The shape of the analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
67
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis increments due to a single observation can directly be associated with the multivariate structure functions, that is a single row or column of B, and their flow dependencies in the case of 4D-Var. Single observation impact experiments with the ECMWF 3D-Var and 4D-Var were carried out by The´paut et al (1996). Based on the theoretical equivalence between 4D-Var and the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) (Ghil and Malanotte-Rizzoli, 1991), the analysis increments from these experiments were used to investigate the dynamical structure functions implied in the ECMWF 4D-Var.…”
Section: Implicit Dynamical Structure Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis increments due to a single observation can directly be associated with the multivariate structure functions, that is a single row or column of B, and their flow dependencies in the case of 4D-Var. Single observation impact experiments with the ECMWF 3D-Var and 4D-Var were carried out by The´paut et al (1996). Based on the theoretical equivalence between 4D-Var and the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) (Ghil and Malanotte-Rizzoli, 1991), the analysis increments from these experiments were used to investigate the dynamical structure functions implied in the ECMWF 4D-Var.…”
Section: Implicit Dynamical Structure Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important aspects of 4D-Var is its implicit flow-dependent assimilation structure functions (The´paut et al, 1996). 4D-Var takes the time dimension into account through the forecast model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated by several authors (Thépaut et al, 1996;Ingleby, 2001), background-error covariances in NWP models are heterogeneous. From a climatological point of view, correlation length-scales are rather high over the oceans while smaller values are observed in the midlatitude storm-track regions, for instance.…”
Section: Homogeneous Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such experimental settings may simulate what we observe in the vicinity of lows and troughs (e.g. midlatitude storms), which are characterized by high variances and small length-scales (Thépaut et al, 1996;Pannekoucke et al, 2007;Raynaud et al, 2009). As explained in the previous sections, the optimization of the homogeneous and heterogeneous filters is based on different metrics.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Heterogeneous Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4D-Var can then outperform 3D-Var if the model has significant skill in evolving the background-error covariance matrix, even though the assimilation cycle is started with a climatological estimate. Though a 6 h or 12 h forecast from a climatological estimate is clearly insufficient to obtain a good estimate, extra value may still be obtained over allowing no evolution at all, as demonstrated, for instance, by Thépaut et al (1996). Conventional 4D-Var will give an optimal estimate of the atmospheric state if the forecast model is perfect and a linearised perturbation model can accurately evolve perturbations to a model state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%