2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical stability analysis of the HD 202206 system and constraints to the planetary orbits

Abstract: Context. Long-term, precise Doppler measurements with the CORALIE spectrograph have revealed the presence of two massive companions to the solar-type star HD 202206. Although the three-body fit of the system is unstable, it was shown that a 5:1 mean motion resonance exists close to the best fit, where the system is stable. It was also hinted that stable solutions with a wide range of mutual inclinations and low O−C were possible. Aims. We present here an extensive dynamical study of the HD 202206 system, aimin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the filtered orbit e u ðtÞ; e v ðtÞ f gdoes not correspond to a real solution of the equations of motion. However, given that the main frequencies m s and m 1 are well-separated and no low-order linear combinations with any significant amplitude appear in the spectral decompositions of uðtÞ and vðtÞ, we expect that the 'corrected' initial condition e u ð0Þ; e v ð0Þ f gwill lead an orbit that is closer to the center of motion (the PO), as also shown by Couetdic et al (2010).…”
Section: The Successive Filtering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the filtered orbit e u ðtÞ; e v ðtÞ f gdoes not correspond to a real solution of the equations of motion. However, given that the main frequencies m s and m 1 are well-separated and no low-order linear combinations with any significant amplitude appear in the spectral decompositions of uðtÞ and vðtÞ, we expect that the 'corrected' initial condition e u ð0Þ; e v ð0Þ f gwill lead an orbit that is closer to the center of motion (the PO), as also shown by Couetdic et al (2010).…”
Section: The Successive Filtering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As shown below, this iterative scheme, which we call 'successive filtering algorithm' converges quickly to the nearest stable PO at given i 0 , starting from an initial guess (non-periodic solution) that need not be close to the PO. In the course of this work we discovered that a similar technique had actually been used by different authors, among which (Couetdic et al, 2010) for finding stable resonant periodic orbits in two-planet systems, Noyelles (2009) and Robutel et al (2011) for studying the 3:2 spin-orbit resonance or the 1:1 resonant coorbital rotation, Dufey et al (2009) in analyzing the latitudinal libration of Mercury, or Delsate (2011) to study ground-track resonances around Vesta. These authors however used the NAFF frequency analysis algorithm of Laskar (1990) that, while being very accurate, needs integrations covering at least a few periods of the slowest component of the orbit.…”
Section: An Iterative Filtering Algorithm For Locating Posmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several exoplanetary systems have been discovered and it is very interesting to know their dynamical stability. There are several authors (Fabrycky & Murray-Clay 2010;Couetdic et al 2010;Davies et al 2014;Adams & Bloch 2015;Petrovich 2015) who have studied about the stability of exoplanetary systems. Davies et al (2014) have reviewed the long-term dynamical evolution of the planetary systems.…”
Section: General Three Body-problem and Dynamical Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability map in the (a, e) plane of the outer planet for different values of i is shown in Figure 7. Here we plot the stability index D = | n 2 − n 1 | (in • yr −1 ) following Couetdic et al (2010), which studied stability of HD202206 system using Laskar's frequency map analysis (Laskar 1990;Laskar et al 2001). Following the analysis, we calculate an average of mean motion of the outer planet in 1000 Kepler periods ( n 1 ) and subtract it from an average of mean motion of the same planet obtained in the next consecutive 1000 Kepler periods ( n 2 ).…”
Section: Dynamical Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%