Mathematical Approaches to Biological Systems 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-55444-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Robustness of Complex Biological Networks

Abstract: Dynamical behavior of biological systems is maintained by interactions between biological units such as neurons, cells, proteins, and molecules. It is a challenging issue to understand robustness of biological interaction networks from a viewpoint of dynamical systems. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of dynamical robustness in complex networks and demonstrate its application to biological networks. First, we introduce the framework for studying the dynamical robustness through analyses of coupled Stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) Figure 5(a) shows the bifurcation diagrams of the variables A x , I x that respectively correspond to the active and inactive prey patches in the reduced model (4), where the inactivation ratio p has been considered as the bifurcation parameter with m = 0.07. Here we would like to note that while discussing Fig.…”
Section: (F)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Figure 5(a) shows the bifurcation diagrams of the variables A x , I x that respectively correspond to the active and inactive prey patches in the reduced model (4), where the inactivation ratio p has been considered as the bifurcation parameter with m = 0.07. Here we would like to note that while discussing Fig.…”
Section: (F)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize that such a setting is different from diffusive coupling and has previously, in the context of laser systems, also been referred to as "injective" coupling [24]. Diffusive coupling is by convention coupling via a term proportional to the state difference between the coupled nodes, that is additive to the individual node dynamics; see, e.g., [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Two settings that are based on, in some sense, similar couplings to what we consider here were previously investigated in the superthreshold regime: A first example demonstrated complex behavior as a function of the system parameters, in particular, regarding amplitude death [29], whereas a second example exhibited the crucial role of the coupling for the synchronization between self-sustained circadian oscillator neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of mammals [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical and theoretical analyses of the transition points in this study are expected to be applied to various real-world problems where dynamics is important, including how to effectively prevent epidemic spreading on transportation networks [ 46 ], how to stabilize electric power supply on power networks [ 47 ], and how to robustly keep neuronal firing activity on complex biological networks [ 48 ]. These real-world networks typically have degree correlations [ 8 ], and therefore, we need to take into consideration not only degree distributions but also degree correlations for characterizing the network structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%