1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021709004193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Reconstruction of Inputs for Contraction Semigroup Systems: Boundary Input Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No additional information on the functions v(·) and u(·) is required. We construct a corresponding modification of the method of extremal shift, using, according to [4][5][6][7][8][9], the idea of its local regularization. Along with measuring the phase states at discrete time moments (see (4)), we also consider the case of "continuous" measuring of the states x(t) and w(t).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No additional information on the functions v(·) and u(·) is required. We construct a corresponding modification of the method of extremal shift, using, according to [4][5][6][7][8][9], the idea of its local regularization. Along with measuring the phase states at discrete time moments (see (4)), we also consider the case of "continuous" measuring of the states x(t) and w(t).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case B 2 = {0} corresponds to a regular system. This case has been studied, for example, in [12,13]. The case B 1 = {0} boils down to solve the problem…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of the pseudoinverse has been thoroughly investigated and it is by now well understood [10]. Hence, we shall assume B 1 = {0} so that the problem that we are studying is an intermediate case, between the computation of the pseudoinverse of an operator and the deconvolution problem as studied in [12,13]. We note however that the proof in [13] uses the assumption that the operator A generates a cosine operator while the proof in [12] assumes that the semigroup e At is contractive.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations