1999
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.68.3631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Properties of the One-Dimensional Supersymmetrict-JModel: A View from Elementary Excitations

Abstract: Dynamical properties, such as dynamical spin and charge structure factors and single-particle spectral functions, are studied for the one-dimensional supersymmetric t-J model with inversesquare interaction. Exact diagonalization and the recursion method are used for finite systems up to 16 sites. A simple rule is proposed to understand the supermultiplet structure in the excitation spectrum. Numerical calculations show that the dynamical spin structure factor is independent of the electron density in the regio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This yields an exhaustive description of the spectrum in the subspaces with well-defined magnon content in terms of suitably restricted bond configurations of the equivalent vertex model, which are closely connected with supersymmetric versions of Haldane's motifs and their related skew Young tableaux. For the particular case m = 2, this description provides a rigorous proof of a long-standing conjecture by Saiga and Kuramoto [21] based on numerical evidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This yields an exhaustive description of the spectrum in the subspaces with well-defined magnon content in terms of suitably restricted bond configurations of the equivalent vertex model, which are closely connected with supersymmetric versions of Haldane's motifs and their related skew Young tableaux. For the particular case m = 2, this description provides a rigorous proof of a long-standing conjecture by Saiga and Kuramoto [21] based on numerical evidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…( 4) are changed to 0 < q i < k F,↓ for i = 1 and 2. From comparison with numerical results [10,12], we find that a similar fact occurs also in the N (Q, ω). Namely, although analytic derivation of N (Q, ω) is restricted to the region 0 < Q < k F,↓ , the expression of the (right-moving) two-holon plus one-antiholon contribution can be extended to the integration range shown in Eq.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In the absence of magnetic field (h = 0), the dynamical spin structure factor was exactly obtained at n = 1 [7,8,9]. It was numerically demonstrated that the weight of the dynamical spin structure factor in the t-J model does not depend on n in the region where only two spinons contribute [10]. This is an indication of the strong spin-charge separation in dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We have checked the validity of Eqs. ( 16) and (18) by comparison with numerical results up to N = 16 [21]. In the special case ν = (0 N h ), momenta of the holon and the antiholon are both zero, and we obtain a form different from Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%