2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.95.180403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Instability and Domain Formation in a Spin-1 Bose-Einstein Condensate

Abstract: We interpret the recently observed spatial domain formation in spin-1 atomic condensates as a result of dynamical instability. Within the mean field theory, a homogeneous condensate is dynamically unstable (stable) for ferromagnetic (antiferromagnetic) atomic interactions. We find that this dynamical instability naturally leads to spontaneous domain formation as observed in several recent experiments for condensates with rather small numbers of atoms. For trapped condensates, our numerical simulations compare … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
57
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9. The latter constantly appear and disappear in a random sequence [9,16,17,21,35,36]. On the contrary, the ground state domains are stationary and are positioned in the center of the trap.…”
Section: Spin Domains and Dynamical Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9. The latter constantly appear and disappear in a random sequence [9,16,17,21,35,36]. On the contrary, the ground state domains are stationary and are positioned in the center of the trap.…”
Section: Spin Domains and Dynamical Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the SMA continued to be used in studies of spinor condensates for its simplicity and validity in a broad range of experimental situations [11,15], in particular when the condensate size is smaller than the spin healing length, which determines the minimum domain size. On the other hand, the dynamical instability, leading to the spontaneous formation of dynamic spin domains, was found to occur in large ferromagnetic condensates prepared in excited initial states [9,[16][17][18], while no such phenomenon was predicted to occur [16] or observed [19] in antiferromagnetic condensates. Similar instabilities were found in the transport of both types of spin-1 condensates in optical lattices [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the magnetic field terms couple all the three modes and cause various types of DIs, including the trivial III S pattern, the common I S [46], and the long-sought I O 's [31,45]. At a relatively large magnetic field, by comparing Fig.…”
Section: Magnetic Field Induced Dynamical Instabilities and Pattmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The competition between spin-dependent collisional interactions and quadratic Zeeman effect lies at the heart of spinor BEC physics. It is the driving force behind coherent oscillations in quasi-homogeneous systems 11,12 , and it is responsible for the quantum phase transition associated with the formation of irregular spatial spin structures 13,14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The competition between spin-dependent collisional interactions and quadratic Zeeman effect lies at the heart of spinor BEC physics. It is the driving force behind coherent oscillations in quasi-homogeneous systems 11,12 , and it is responsible for the quantum phase transition associated with the formation of irregular spatial spin structures 13,14 .The wavefunction of a spin-F condensate can be written in terms of a density and a local spinor, ψ m (x) = n(x)ζ m (x), normalized to the total number of particles n(x) dx = N and unity F m=−F |ζ m | 2 = 1 respectively. In the simplest case of a spin-1 condensate, the local meanfield energy associated with ψ is given by g 0 n + g 1 n F 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%