2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical evolution of the shock cone around 4D Einstein-Gauss Bonnet rotating black hole

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These simulations are critical for interpreting the complex dynamics near the black holes, where the gravitational effects significantly influence the behavior of the accreating matter [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. In recent years, using alternative theories of gravity, the dynamic structure of the shock cone in regions with very strong gravitational forces has been examined [26][27][28]. It has been revealed how the shock cone changes depending on various parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulations are critical for interpreting the complex dynamics near the black holes, where the gravitational effects significantly influence the behavior of the accreating matter [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. In recent years, using alternative theories of gravity, the dynamic structure of the shock cone in regions with very strong gravitational forces has been examined [26][27][28]. It has been revealed how the shock cone changes depending on various parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code execution time, with t max = 33000M , is considerably longer than the expected time. Numerical verification has confirmed that the qualitative outcomes of the simulations, such as the presence of quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) and instabilities, the location of shocks, and the behavior of the accretion rates, are mostly independent of variations in the grid resolution (Donmez, Orhan 2021;Donmez 2022;Donmez et al 2022). Furthermore, it is believed that positioning the outer boundary far enough away from the region where artifacts possibly produced at the outer boundary do not impact the physical solution.…”
Section: Initial and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The code execution time (t max = 30000M ) significantly exceeded the time (∼ 5000M ) required for the model to reach the steady state. It has been verified that the qualitative outcomes of the numerical solutions, such as the presence of quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) and instabilities, the location of shocks, and the behavior of the accretion rates, are not significantly influenced by the grid resolution (Donmez, Orhan 2021;Donmez 2022;Donmez et al 2022) Ensuring the accurate treatment of boundaries is crucial to avoid unphysical solutions in numerical simulations. For the inner radial boundary, an outflow boundary condition is implemented, allowing gas to fall into the black hole through a simple zerothorder extrapolation.…”
Section: Initial and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to their results, the disk around the 4D EGB black hole for the positive value of α is more luminous and hotter than the one in General Relativity GR (Heydari-Fard et al 2021). The numerical investigation of a BHL accretion in the 4D EGB extensively was studied in the vicinities of the non-rotating (Donmez, Orhan 2021) and the rotating black holes (Donmez 2022). They discussed the effect of GB coupling constant α on the shock cone structure created during the formation of the accretion disk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%