2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07073-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to figure 4, multi-fold gravity scattering amplitude is indeed the square of the kinematic scattering amplitude of the corresponding Yang Mills particle, at least when they are all massless, i.e. above the energy levels of the multi-fold gravity electroweak symmetry breaking energy scales [38].…”
Section: Double Copy Compatibility With Multi-fold Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to figure 4, multi-fold gravity scattering amplitude is indeed the square of the kinematic scattering amplitude of the corresponding Yang Mills particle, at least when they are all massless, i.e. above the energy levels of the multi-fold gravity electroweak symmetry breaking energy scales [38].…”
Section: Double Copy Compatibility With Multi-fold Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-fold paper [1] proposes contributions to several open problems in physics, like the reconciliation of General Relativity (GR) with Quantum Physics, explaining the origin of gravity proposed as emerging from quantum (EPR-Einstein Podolsky Rosen) entanglement between particles, detailing contributions to dark matter and dark energy, and qualitatively explaining many other Standard Model and Standard Cosmology Model (ΛCDM) mysteries without requiring New Physics beyond the Standard Model other than the addition of gravity to the Standard Model Lagrangian [1,[4][5][6][7][11][12][13][14][15][16]24,25,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]113]. All this is achieved in a multi-fold universe that may well model our real universe, which remains to be validated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, we expect a desert of new fundamental particle above the energy scales of the gravity electroweak symmetry breaking [1,23,51,56,[77][78][79]87,89,93,96]. Also in that context, [22,30,78,91]. Indeed, these latter two papers show how no particles are beyond the ones known today (with our interpretation of the Majorana / neutrino (or possibly related to M* in [29], which is to be revisited in the future).…”
Section: Note Added Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spacetime locations and particles can be modeled as microscopic black holes (Schwarzschild for photons and concretized spacetime coordinates, and metrics between Reisner Nordstrom [2] and Kerr Newman [3] for massive and possibly charged particles -the latter being possibly extremal). Particles result from patterns of massless Higgs random walk (massless particles above gravity electroweak symmetry breaking [1,23,[77][78][79]) or condensates of massless Higgs (massive, below gravity electroweak symmetry breaking [1,22,[85][86][87]), implementing solitons obtained by space time matter induction and scattering from a 7D spacetime [1,29,30,63]. Although possibly surprising, [1] recovers results consistent with others (see [4] and its references), while also being able to justify the initial assumptions of black holes from the gravity or entanglement model in a multi-fold universe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%