2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.71.064608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical core deformation effects on single-nucleon knockout reactions at fragmentation beam energies

Abstract: The effects of core deformation and of its dynamical reorientation and rotational excitation on the inclusive single-neutron knockout reaction cross sections on light spherical target nuclei are examined. The projectile nuclei are modeled within the framework of a weak-coupling, quadrupole-deformed core-plus-neutron two-body model. We formulate the inclusion of this non-spectator-core degree of freedom within the nonperturbative eikonal model and calculate the elastic and inelastic breakup (or stripping) neutr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The residue momentum distributions were found to be indicative of the orbital angular momentum content of the Nilsson state. Deformation effects on elastic breakup, of importance for weakly bound deformed-core systems, were also considered, in a weak-coupling model [29], assuming spherical single-particle states coupled to a deformed core. The calculated stripping cross sections were once again found to be weakly dependent on the assumed core deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residue momentum distributions were found to be indicative of the orbital angular momentum content of the Nilsson state. Deformation effects on elastic breakup, of importance for weakly bound deformed-core systems, were also considered, in a weak-coupling model [29], assuming spherical single-particle states coupled to a deformed core. The calculated stripping cross sections were once again found to be weakly dependent on the assumed core deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stripping is a very different process and cannot at present be described within XCDCC. Eikonal studies have shown that core excitation does not affect the stripping component [30]. For the purpose of comparison with the data, the eikonal model was used to produce the necessary stripping cross sections [33].…”
Section: Some Results With Xcdccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the loosely bound projectile cannot be described as a single particle state, core excited components may well exist in the initial state of the projectile. Models that take into account core excitation during breakup processes [29,30] have either neglected interference between the various projectile components or made an eikonal approximation of the reaction. XCDCC incorporates in a consistent way, core excitation in the bound and scattering states of the projectile (fully coupled), as well as dynamical excitation of the core as it interacts with the target.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on β 2 , each shell occupation amplitude in Eqs. (18) and (19) changes and so do their wave functions, as displayed in Fig. 1 (see also Fig.…”
Section: B Nucleon Knockout From 31 Nementioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is expected because the p 3/2 state and the s 1/2 state [in Eqs. (18) and (19)] have different, less space confining, centrifugal barriers than the corresponding f 7/2 and d 3/2 states, respectively. Therefore, admixture with the p 3/2 state and the s 1/2 state will induce narrower momentum distributions due to a larger spatial extension of the wave functions.…”
Section: B Nucleon Knockout From 31 Nementioning
confidence: 99%