2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1513469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical control of the chaotic state of the current-driven ion acoustic instability in a laboratory plasma using delayed feedback

Abstract: Controlling chaos caused by the current-driven ion acoustic instability is attempted using the delayed continuous feedback method, i.e., the time-delay auto synchronization (TDAS) method introduced by Pyragas [Phys. Lett. A 170 (1992) 421.]. When the control is applied to the typical chaotic state, chaotic orbit changes to periodic one, maintaining the instability. The chaotic state is well controlled using the TDAS method.It is found that the control is achieved when a delay time is chosen near the unstable p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism of stabilization of the Pyragas orbit by a transcritical bifurcation relies upon the possible existence of such delay-induced periodic orbits with T = τ. Technically, the proof of the odd-number limitation theorem in [21] fails because the trivial Floquet multiplier μ = 1 (Goldstone mode of periodic orbit) was neglected there; F(1) in Eq. (14) in [21] is thus zero and not less than zero, as assumed [33]. At TC, where a second Floquet multiplier crosses the unit circle, this results in a Floquet multiplier μ = 1 of algebraic multiplicity two.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanism of stabilization of the Pyragas orbit by a transcritical bifurcation relies upon the possible existence of such delay-induced periodic orbits with T = τ. Technically, the proof of the odd-number limitation theorem in [21] fails because the trivial Floquet multiplier μ = 1 (Goldstone mode of periodic orbit) was neglected there; F(1) in Eq. (14) in [21] is thus zero and not less than zero, as assumed [33]. At TC, where a second Floquet multiplier crosses the unit circle, this results in a Floquet multiplier μ = 1 of algebraic multiplicity two.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although time-delayed feedback control has been widely used with great success in real world problems in physics, chemistry, biology, and medicine, e.g. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], a severe limitation used to be imposed by the common belief that certain orbits cannot be stabilized for any strength of the control force. In fact, it had been contended that periodic orbits with an odd number of real Floquet multipliers greater than unity cannot be stabilized by the Pyragas method [20][21][22][23][24][25], even if the simple scheme (2.1) is extended by multiple delays in form of an infinite series [26].…”
Section: Z(t) = F (λ Z(t)) + B[z(t − τ) − Z(t)]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although time-delayed feedback control has been widely used with great success in real world problems in physics, chemistry, biology, and medicine, e.g. [115,116,117,73,118,119,64,120,121,122,71,72,38], severe limitations are imposed by the common belief that certain orbits cannot be stabilized for any strength of the control force. In fact, it has been contended that periodic orbits with an odd number of real Floquet multipliers greater than unity cannot be stabilized by the Pyragas method [43,44,123,124,125,126], even if the simple scheme is extended by multiple delays in form of an infinite series [39].…”
Section: Beyond the Odd Number Limitation Of Unstable Periodic Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the only information required a priori is the period τ of the target UPO, rather than a detailed knowledge of the profile of the orbit, or even any knowledge of the form of the original ODEs, which may be useful in experimental setups. The method has been implemented successfully in a variety of laboratory situations [2,3,4,5,6,7,8], as well as analytically and numerically in spatially extended pattern-forming systems [9,10,11,12]; more examples can be found in a recent review by Pyragas [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%