1994
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.50.2564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical approach to anomalous diffusion: Response of Lévy processes to a perturbation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a sense this analysis shows that thermodynamics is possible also in the region where the central limit theorem holds in the generalized form established by Lévy [35,36]. It is interesting to remark that earlier research work [37,38] has established that the dynamical approach to diffusion, based on the stationary assumption on the fluctuations responsible for diffusion, is incompatible with the condition µ < 2. In this region a diffusion process must rest on a continuous-time random walk method implying the breakdown of the stationary assumption [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In a sense this analysis shows that thermodynamics is possible also in the region where the central limit theorem holds in the generalized form established by Lévy [35,36]. It is interesting to remark that earlier research work [37,38] has established that the dynamical approach to diffusion, based on the stationary assumption on the fluctuations responsible for diffusion, is incompatible with the condition µ < 2. In this region a diffusion process must rest on a continuous-time random walk method implying the breakdown of the stationary assumption [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This scaling is the same scaling as that of the second moment [5,16] and it is different from the Lévy scaling, which is, as we shall see in Section IV, α = 1/(β + 1). Thus, in the late time region the exact solution of Eq.…”
Section: Late Time Behaviormentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By means of the stationary assumption, we recover the results of Refs. [4,19,20] and we realize why these earlier results go beyond the Green-Kubo prediction [21,22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%