1969
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(69)90075-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic yield behavior of shock-loaded iron from 76 to 573°k

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elastic precursor decay is obtained by subtracting the corresponding curve shown in fig.2 from a reference hyper-elastic state. Fig.2 is consistent with experimental observation that the rate of decay increases with the strain rate [39]. Here the strain rate's effect is not entirely comparable to experiment, as in the latter the magnitude of the shock itself would vary too [40].…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…The elastic precursor decay is obtained by subtracting the corresponding curve shown in fig.2 from a reference hyper-elastic state. Fig.2 is consistent with experimental observation that the rate of decay increases with the strain rate [39]. Here the strain rate's effect is not entirely comparable to experiment, as in the latter the magnitude of the shock itself would vary too [40].…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…(56) found,systematica11y, an increase in twin density as the pulse duration was increased from 0.5 to 1.0 ~s, in both the A1S1 1008 steel and Armco magnetic ingot iron. The twins generated by the shock pulse should not be confused with the ones formed by the elastic precursor wave, in iron; the latter ones were investigated by Rohde and coworkers (57,58). Although twins are generated by the elastic precursor waves, the volume percent of twins generated by the shock wave is an order of magnitude higher.…”
Section: Deformation Twinning a Effect Of Materials And Shock-wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…s is the static flow stress and is regarded as the average between the yield stress and ultimate tensile stress for the purposes of this paper, and F~2 psi sec. Comparisons with recent measurements [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] show that Equation (12) description of actual test data. The interpretation is complicated by twinning, which is not very prevalent in fine-grained pipe steels but may have reduced the strength levels observed by Rhode [19] and by Oxley and Stevenson [17] at the highest strain rates.…”
Section: Plastic Deformationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This means that ~ 1.2 x 104-1.5 x 105 sec-1 for a crack propagating at 500 fps. The flow stress, t?, of steel under these conditions is likely to be 2 x to 3 x the value measured in an ordinary tensile test [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and this will influence the magnitude of the COD, as described in the next section. Following the procedure in Reference 21, the rate dependence is approximated by a simple linear relation :…”
Section: Plastic Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%