First International Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks
DOI: 10.1109/qshine.2004.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic widest path selection for connection admission control in core-stateless networks

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach was to eliminate all issues related to traffic parameter variations, flow policing, throughput control, ensuring fairness, delay and jitter control, etc., from the CAC process and let those issues be handled at other procedural levels (see packet handling procedures described in [11] and [12]) still keeping within the core stateless paradigm by transferring the required information through the dynamic packet state [7]. Consequently, the CAC procedure has only to take care that the edge-to-edge path chosen by the path selection algorithm [13] has the required characteristics (bandwidth + imposed restrictions) and it does not care if the flows are in-or out-of-profile. However, in order to ensure an effective operation (better accommodation of bursty traffic that is still in-profile on the average, treatment of best effort traffic, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach was to eliminate all issues related to traffic parameter variations, flow policing, throughput control, ensuring fairness, delay and jitter control, etc., from the CAC process and let those issues be handled at other procedural levels (see packet handling procedures described in [11] and [12]) still keeping within the core stateless paradigm by transferring the required information through the dynamic packet state [7]. Consequently, the CAC procedure has only to take care that the edge-to-edge path chosen by the path selection algorithm [13] has the required characteristics (bandwidth + imposed restrictions) and it does not care if the flows are in-or out-of-profile. However, in order to ensure an effective operation (better accommodation of bursty traffic that is still in-profile on the average, treatment of best effort traffic, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated in the works of Ali et al and Dumitrescu that the number of user connections that the network can accommodate is mainly limited by the available bandwidth of the bottleneck link so the load‐balancing performance is better when the available bandwidth of each link is more similar. Therefore, from the perspective of load balancing, it is desirable that the available bandwidth after reservation of every link is the same (representing as C′ ).…”
Section: Tunnel Optimization With Nubrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm that the maximum available bandwidth selected firstly was proposed by Avadora [6],which can deal with the problem that whether there is constraints from QoS parameter more better.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%