2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic wheat yield forecasts are improved by a hybrid approach using a biophysical model and machine learning technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, this study provides a method reference for establishing the yield prediction model of other crops. The R 2 between the yield and NDVI rate of GP1, GP2, and GP4 ranged from 0.27 to 0.44, indicating that it may be more beneficial to organize time series data parameters based on the GP [ 25 ] and provide support for dynamic yield predictions with the growth stages as a time unit [ 26 ]. The combination of the duration and rate in each GP can simply simulate the crop growth process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, this study provides a method reference for establishing the yield prediction model of other crops. The R 2 between the yield and NDVI rate of GP1, GP2, and GP4 ranged from 0.27 to 0.44, indicating that it may be more beneficial to organize time series data parameters based on the GP [ 25 ] and provide support for dynamic yield predictions with the growth stages as a time unit [ 26 ]. The combination of the duration and rate in each GP can simply simulate the crop growth process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition leads to spatial-temporal heterogeneity between the yield prediction variables. Experiments have shown that phenological dynamic information can solve this heterogeneity issue and improve the yield prediction or estimation accuracy [ 25 , 26 ]. For example, the accumulative leaf area index (LAI) in a specific GP had the highest correlation with the regional crop yield [ 27 ], and the time series index, combined with phenological date information, can effectively improve the yield prediction accuracy [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pede et al [36] assessed the potential benefits of LST derived by satellite for maize yield prediction across the US Corn Belt from 2010 to 2016 by using metrics of killing degree day (KDD) and growing degree day (GDD). Feng et al [37] developed a hybrid yield forecasting approach by combing climate extremes, NDVI, crop-process model simulated biomass, and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) with a regression model (RF or multiple linear regression (MLR)). They found that the forecasting system based on RF was better than that based on MLR at each forecasting event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable statistical algorithm that remote sensing data can depend on is critical for the estimation of crop yield. As one of the challenging problems in agriculture, many previous studies have tried to find a more accurate way between diversified regression models [23][24][25][26]. Machine learning algorithms have become an important decision support tool in massive crop yield estimation [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%