2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000227220.67613.0d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic versus static respiratory mechanics in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

Abstract: Exploiting dynamic respiratory mechanics during incremental PEEP, both compliance and recruitment can be assessed simultaneously. Based on these findings, application of dynamic respiratory mechanics as a diagnostic tool in ventilated patients should be more appropriate than using static pressure-volume curves.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
115
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The module measures dynamic compliance, which is the ratio of change in volume to the change in pressure during inspiration. Dynamic compliance is calculated using the least squares fitting method of the flow, volume, and raw pressure waveform [16][17][18]. Blood pressure was measured with an automated NIBP device (Philips Intellivue MP70).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The module measures dynamic compliance, which is the ratio of change in volume to the change in pressure during inspiration. Dynamic compliance is calculated using the least squares fitting method of the flow, volume, and raw pressure waveform [16][17][18]. Blood pressure was measured with an automated NIBP device (Philips Intellivue MP70).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both patient studies (ARDS group, control group) were approved by the local ethics committees (details in Stahl et al [12] and Ganzert et al [20]) and provide flow, volume and pressure data.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used the McREM clinical data (full details are available at Stahl et al [12]). In this dataset different respiratory maneuvers were carried out on 28 mechanical ventilated ARDS patients.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were mechanically ventilated with low-flow (LF) manoeuvres performed using a Evita4Lab-System (Stahl et al 2006). During the LF-Manoeuvre, the lung is inflated by an extremely low constant gas flow of 35 mL/s over 55 s, yielding a quasi-static pressure/volume curve.…”
Section: Subject and Clinical Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%