2020
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b3-2020-947-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Time Warping for Crops Mapping

Abstract: Abstract. Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) has been successfully used for crops mapping due to its capability to achieve good classification results when a reduced number of training samples and irregular satellite image time series is available. Despite its recognized advantages, DTW does not account for the duration and seasonality of crops and local differences when assessing the similarity between two temporal sequences. In this study, we implemented a Weighted Derivative modification of DTW (WDDTW) and compared… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TWDTW process also generated longer computation time due to the O (n ˆ2) complexity problem from calculating the per-pixel distance to the training areas, which requires parallel/multi-core process to fasten the analysis [46]. In addition, the classification of TWDTW does not consider the phenology of crops (seasonality and duration) [47]; instead, it relies on the ability from the temporal spectral values from the training areas to classify objects. Therefore, improvement for TWDTW can be made by incorporating the crop phenology information to the weight [48], or by using the modified fuzzy TWDTW classification to account for the uncertainty in the classification process [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TWDTW process also generated longer computation time due to the O (n ˆ2) complexity problem from calculating the per-pixel distance to the training areas, which requires parallel/multi-core process to fasten the analysis [46]. In addition, the classification of TWDTW does not consider the phenology of crops (seasonality and duration) [47]; instead, it relies on the ability from the temporal spectral values from the training areas to classify objects. Therefore, improvement for TWDTW can be made by incorporating the crop phenology information to the weight [48], or by using the modified fuzzy TWDTW classification to account for the uncertainty in the classification process [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other similarity evaluation methods, DTW overcomes the scale displacement problem to a certain extent, solves the matching problem for unequal-length time series, and can mitigate the effects of outliers to achieve an enhanced matching result for similar features. In recent years, the DTW algorithm has been combined with optical remote sensing vegetation indices and applied for the classification of remote sensing images and the classification and extraction of vegetation or land cover [45], [46], [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is to use agglomerative hierarchical clustering with a dynamic time warping (DTW) distance to define similarity between series from different participants. DTW is a popular approach for creating clusters based on patterns over a time series, and has been used to recognize speech patterns, predict stock price, monitor crop dynamics for industrial farms, and monitor wear time of medical interventions in sleep apnea (Belgiu et al., 2020; Berndt & Clifford, 1994; Bottaz‐Bosson et al., 2021; Juang, 1984). In Figure 1, participants 51 and 58 have similar patterns of breaks, or “vacations,” during the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%