2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2001)6:1(54)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Tests on Large Cable-Stayed Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a few examples (Cunha et al, 2001) free decay to impulsive or suddenly released load has been used.…”
Section: Dynamic Testing For Condition Assessment and System Identifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a few examples (Cunha et al, 2001) free decay to impulsive or suddenly released load has been used.…”
Section: Dynamic Testing For Condition Assessment and System Identifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since ambient vibration tests do not interrupt service of the test structure (e.g., shutting down traffic during bridge testing), they can be used readily for long term continuous structural health monitoring applications. Ambient vibration tests have been successfully applied to a variety of bridge structures such as the Vincent Thomas suspension bridge (Abdel-Ghaffar and Housner, 1978), Golden Gate suspension bridge (Abdel-Ghaffar and Scanlan 1985), Roebling suspension bridge (Ren et al 2004a), Safti Link curved cable-stayed bridge (Brownjohn et al 1999), Vasco da Gama cable-stayed bridge (Cunha et al 2001), twin curved cable-stayed bridges on the north and south sides of Malpensa airport in Milan (Gentile and Martinez y Cabrera 2004), Brent-Spence truss bridge (Harik et al 1997) and Tennesse River steel arch bridge (Ren et al 2004b). In these studies, system identification based on ambient vibration test data provided accurate estimates of natural frequencies and mode shapes despite the relatively low amplitude of the measured vibrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices can be used to no contact measure of both small and large displacements. Their accuracy and dynamic range is also high [8][9][10][11] and thus, they can be used in a high variety of applications [12][13][14]. Unfortunately, these devices tend to be very expensive, what makes that they are not cost-effective for many applications.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Vibrations and Displacements Of Structures Undmentioning
confidence: 99%