2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1067/8/082021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic testing and characterization of advanced materials in a new experiment at CERN HiRadMat facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The damage results seen in these experiments are consistent with those obtained in the earlier material study experiments performed in the HiRadMat test area [30,31]. The damage threshold is ∼200 kJ and the extent of damage is of the order of 10 cm in length and 2 mm in width.…”
Section: Irradiation Test Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The damage results seen in these experiments are consistent with those obtained in the earlier material study experiments performed in the HiRadMat test area [30,31]. The damage threshold is ∼200 kJ and the extent of damage is of the order of 10 cm in length and 2 mm in width.…”
Section: Irradiation Test Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The CERN HiRadMat facility allows for destructive testing of accelerator components, including collimators [28,29] and novel materials [30,31]. It takes proton (or heavy ion) beams from the SPS at a maximum energy of 440 GeV, in a train of up to 288 bunches.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the resistivity of the substrate is not important for beam stability, provided that the coating thickness is sufficiently large, studies show that a good adhesion and a low coating resistivity is achieved when using MoGr as substrate material (see Section 4 for details). Alternative coatings such as Cu on CFC or MoGr were also studied in dedicated HiRadMat tests [25] but ultimately deemed unfavorable due to the high risk of radiation damage induced in the coating due to beam scratching or impact. For this reason, we restrict ourselves to the analysis of Mo coating layers.…”
Section: Considered Materials Choices For Collimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). The downside of the coating is its lower tolerance to beam losses compared to Mo, which was observed in HiRadMat tests at CERN [52].…”
Section: B Cu Coatingmentioning
confidence: 99%