2022
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11071028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Task Allocation of Multiple UAVs Based on Improved A-QCDPSO

Abstract: With the rapid changes in the battlefield situation, the requirement of time for UAV groups to deal with complex tasks is getting higher, which puts forward higher requirements for the dynamic allocation of the UAV group. However, most of the existing methods focus on task pre-allocation, and the research on dynamic task allocation technology during task execution is not sufficient. Aiming at the high real-time requirement of the multi-UAV collaborative dynamic task allocation problem, this paper introduces th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six UAVs are set up in experimental scenario 2, and the total number of agricultural tasks to be performed is 50, and the rest of the conditions are consistent with experimental scenario 1. The multi-UAV cooperative task allocation algorithms based on CAM-GA [23], A-QCDPSO [24], SOA [25], PSO-AWOA [26], CESMA [27], and TLISOA are selected for comparison, and each algorithm's population size is population = 30 , and the maximum iteration is iteration Max = 500 ; in order to reduce the impact of randomness in the algorithm, each algorithm is run independently 20 times, and the simulation environment is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six UAVs are set up in experimental scenario 2, and the total number of agricultural tasks to be performed is 50, and the rest of the conditions are consistent with experimental scenario 1. The multi-UAV cooperative task allocation algorithms based on CAM-GA [23], A-QCDPSO [24], SOA [25], PSO-AWOA [26], CESMA [27], and TLISOA are selected for comparison, and each algorithm's population size is population = 30 , and the maximum iteration is iteration Max = 500 ; in order to reduce the impact of randomness in the algorithm, each algorithm is run independently 20 times, and the simulation environment is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An upgraded cellular automaton (CA) and an optimal spanning tree technique were utilized by Li et al [24] to build the path network and find the best routes between various endpoints. Zhang et al [25] dynamically divided the particle swarm based on the particle mass and changed the topology of the algorithm. In addition, dynamic problems in tasking problems are common.…”
Section: Algorithm For Solving Uav Task Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the shorter route (green dotted line) is abandoned. The list of tasks to be allocated is TL un = [20, 21,22]. The UAVs participating in task reassignment are [1], [7,16], [], [], [8], [0, 10]], and the leftover task list of UAV formation is TL = [ [13,5,4], [6,15,12], [14], [17,18], [], [], [19,9], [11,3]].…”
Section: Task Reassignment In the Case Of Uav Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance differences of UAVs were not considered in the model. Zhang et al [ 21 ] studied the dynamic task assignment problem in the context of multi-UAVs attacking multiple ground targets cooperatively and considered the emergence of new targets and sudden UAV failure. However, the time window constraint of targets and movement of targets were not considered in the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%