Dynamic tabletop interfaces for increasing creativity

Schmitt, Lothar M.; Buisine, Stéphanie; Chaboissier, Jonathan; Aoussat, Améziane; Vernier, Frédéric

doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.007

Cited by 27 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A wide range of techniques for modelling learning processes has long been used to support reflection on the basis of developing knowledge, skills and performance [9]. Our approach draws on key literature about Cooperative and Competitive visualisations [26,47,49] and on Open Learner Models (OLMs) [11,12,17], with the aim to enable groups to become aware of key activity aspects. Reflection involves actively monitoring, evaluating and modifying peoples' understanding of processes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fig. 1) have proven effective in facilitating face-to-face group brainstorming for small-groups and can be used to support the free flow of ideas [6,14,47]. These shared interfaces enable people to generate ideas in parallel, interact with digital representations of these and save their work for future revision.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These shared interfaces enable people to generate ideas in parallel, interact with digital representations of these and save their work for future revision. Interactive tabletops provide new ways to tackle group problems such as free riding, social loafing and idea blocking [47]. This includes coding outputs to show contributions, and the use of multiple inputs to mitigate the need for turn taking [15,27].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A student-facing dashboard for supporting sensemaking about the brainstorm process at a multi-surface space

Clayphan

Martínez-Maldonado

Kay

2017

Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We developed a student-facing dashboard tuned to support posthoc sensemaking in terms of participation and group effects in the context of collocated brainstorming. Grounding on foundations of small-group collaboration, open learner modelling and brainstorming at large interactive displays, we designed a set of models from behavioural data that can be visually presented to students. We validated the effectiveness of our dashboard in provoking group reflection by addressing two questions: (1) What do group members gain from studying measures of egalitarian contribution? and (2) What do group members gain from modelling how they sparked ideas off each other? We report on outcomes from a study with higher education students performing brainstorming. We present evidence from i) descriptive quantitative usage patterns; and ii) qualitative experiential descriptions reported by the students. We conclude the paper with a discussion that can be useful for the community in the design of collective reflection systems.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A student-facing dashboard for supporting sensemaking about the brainstorm process at a multi-surface space

Clayphan

Martínez-Maldonado

Kay

2017

Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, horizontal table displays can invite egalitarian participation but vertical shared displays can be better for visualising the whole artefact produced by a group or groups (Rogers, Lim, Hazlewood, & Marshall, 2009). Similarly, combining tablets and tabletops to support group discussions may promote the use of gestures and touch across devices (Oleksik, Milic-Frayling, & Jones, 2014) while maintaining situation and group awareness (Schmitt, Buisine, Chaboissier, Aoussat, & Vernier, 2012). However, the use of an ecology of surfaces for team-based design work has not received much attention by researchers, and so even less is known about their use in design for learning.…”

Section: Interactive Surfaces For Small Group Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supporting collaborative design activity in a multi-user digital design ecology

Martínez-Maldonado

Goodyear

Carvalho

et al. 2017

Computers in Human Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Across a broad range of design professions, there has been extensive research on design practices and considerable progress in creating new computer-based systems that support design work. Our research is focused on educational/instructional design for students' learning. In this sub-field, progress has been more limited. In particular, neither research nor systems development have paid much attention to the fact that design is becoming a more collaborative endeavor. This paper reports the latest research outcomes from R&D in the Educational Design Studio (EDS), a facility developed iteratively over four years to support and understand collaborative, real-time, co-present design work. The EDS serves to (i) enhance our scientific understanding of design processes and design cognition and (ii) provide insights into how designers' work can be improved through appropriate technological support. In the study presented here, we introduced a complex, multiuser, digital design tool into the existing ecology of tools and resources available in the EDS. We analysed the activity of four pairs of 'teacher-designers' during a design task. We identified different behaviors -in reconfiguring the task, the working methods and toolset usage. Our data provide new insights about the affordances of different digital and analogue design surfaces used in the Studio.

show abstract

“…Perrin [1] provided a complete definition based on three axioms: -"No innovation without market validation." Innovation is the first commercial use of a product, process, or service that has never been used before [2,3]. -"No innovation without design stages": the design process must be the backbone of the innovation process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assembly Based Methods to Support Product Innovation in Design for Additive Manufacturing: An Exploratory Case Study

Laverne

Segonds

Anwer

et al. 2015

Journal of Mechanical Design

161

138

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

is an open access repository that collects the work of Arts et Métiers ParisTech researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. Additive manufacturing (AM) is emerging as an important manufacturing process and a key technology for enabling innovative product development. Design for additive manu-facturing (DFAM) is nowadays a major challenge to exploit properly the potential of AM in product innovation and product manufacturing. However, in recent years, several DFAM methods have been developed with various design purposes. In this paper, we first present a state-of-the-art overview of the existing DFAM methods, then we introduce a classification of DFAM methods based on intermediate representations (IRs) and prod-uct's systemic level, and we make a comparison focused on the prospects for product innovation. Furthermore, we present an assembly based DFAM method using AM knowl-edge during the idea generation process in order to develop innovative architectures. A case study demonstrates the relevance of such approach. The main contribution of this paper is an early DFAM method consisting of four stages as follows: choice and develop-ment of (1) concepts, (2) working principles, (3) working structures, and (4) synthesis and conversion of the data in design features. This method will help designers to improve their design features, by taking into account the constraints of AM in the early stages.

show abstract

Dynamic tabletop interfaces for increasing creativity

Abstract: is an open access repository that collects the work of Arts et Métiers ParisTech researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible.This is an author-deposited version published in: http://sam.ensam.eu Handle

Cited by 27 publications

References 57 publications

A student-facing dashboard for supporting sensemaking about the brainstorm process at a multi-surface space

A student-facing dashboard for supporting sensemaking about the brainstorm process at a multi-surface space

Supporting collaborative design activity in a multi-user digital design ecology

Assembly Based Methods to Support Product Innovation in Design for Additive Manufacturing: An Exploratory Case Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About