2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.80.235130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic susceptibilities of the single-impurity Anderson model within an enhanced noncrossing approximation

Abstract: The single impurity Anderson model (SIAM) is studied within an enhanced non-crossing approximation (ENCA). This method is extended to the calculation of susceptibilities and thoroughly tested, also in order to prepare applications as a building block for the calculation of susceptibilities and phase transitions in correlated lattice systems. A wide range of model parameters, such as impurity occupancy, temperature, local Coulomb repulsion and hybridization strength, are studied. Results for the spin and charge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(117 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the agreement between the three methods is very good and deviations only occur at large energies, establishing the too low energy scale to be the main source of discrepancy between the ENCA and RG methods. The deviations for ω/T * 1 observable in panel (b) are on the one hand due to the improper description of correlated valence fluctuations 17,52 and on the other hand due to the thermal broadening required in ENCA.…”
Section: 52mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, the agreement between the three methods is very good and deviations only occur at large energies, establishing the too low energy scale to be the main source of discrepancy between the ENCA and RG methods. The deviations for ω/T * 1 observable in panel (b) are on the one hand due to the improper description of correlated valence fluctuations 17,52 and on the other hand due to the thermal broadening required in ENCA.…”
Section: 52mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While magnetic properties, i.e., the magnetic susceptibility, are described excellently, charge fluctuations are not as well accounted for. 52 In the spectral functions, where spin and charge fluctuations contribute equally, this leads to an overestimation of the height of the many-body resonance at the Fermi level at too low temperatures. The dynamic charge susceptibility is overestimated for very low frequencies.…”
Section: B Enhanced Non-crossing Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A central object in the Anderson junction is the charge susceptibility, χ c ( n C ) = d n C /dµ. At half-filling, this is known analytically [33,34]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Too low temperatures can not be investigated with our impurity solver due to the violation of Fermi liquid properties. 28,37 Additionally, in the high-energy part of the spectrum the inclusion of additional neighbors seems to bring out more of the van-Hove singularities at ω = ±D of the original unperturbed (U = 0) spectrum [see inset of Fig. 2(a)].…”
Section: Self-consistent Scheme Applied To the 2d-hubbard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%