“…This reflects Clark and Rowlinson’s (2004) call to action, which suggested that a recourse to theoretically informed history with its potential for rich narratives could displace economically deterministic understandings of organizational phenomena or instrumentalist uses of history as retrospective sensemaking. This call has been heeded in studies of ANTi-history (Durepos and Mills, 2012a), rhetorical history (Anteby and Molnar, 2012; McGaughey, 2013; Oertel and Thommes, 2015; Suddaby et al, 2010), memory studies (Foster et al, 2011; Mena et al, 2016; Ocasio et al, 2016) and the uses of the past (Foster et al, 2017; Gillett and Tennent, 2017; Illia and Zamparini, 2016; Lubinski, 2018; Maclean et al, 2014; Tennent and Gillett, 2016; 2018) all which have been debated, theorized and tested with increased fervour and rigour. This has led to significant contributions to the ways we understand and engage with history in and around organizations.…”