2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-019-4043-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic stress accumulation model of granite residual soil under cyclic loading based on small-size creep tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, after coupled loading, a descriptive analysis of the rock damage evolution process is performed by determining the properties such as failure strength, residual strength, cumulative plastic strain, and so on (Cai et al, 2020;Jin et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2010Wang et al, , 2013. However, when the initial stress of rocks is close to the instability strength (in the vicinity of the strength limit), a small disturbance not exceeding the peak value can also cause instability (Tang et al, 2014), and the strength-based criteria may become invalid. On the other hand, the instability process of rocks can be described by defining energy-related damage variables (Li et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2021), but most of the existing studies only define damage deterioration of rock materials by roughly analyzing the evolution law of dissipated energy, which also cannot reveal the energy conversion relationship in the vicinity of strength limit accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, after coupled loading, a descriptive analysis of the rock damage evolution process is performed by determining the properties such as failure strength, residual strength, cumulative plastic strain, and so on (Cai et al, 2020;Jin et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2010Wang et al, , 2013. However, when the initial stress of rocks is close to the instability strength (in the vicinity of the strength limit), a small disturbance not exceeding the peak value can also cause instability (Tang et al, 2014), and the strength-based criteria may become invalid. On the other hand, the instability process of rocks can be described by defining energy-related damage variables (Li et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2021), but most of the existing studies only define damage deterioration of rock materials by roughly analyzing the evolution law of dissipated energy, which also cannot reveal the energy conversion relationship in the vicinity of strength limit accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yin et al employed the strain model of soft clay to describe the permanent strain of the GRS under different water content and confining pressure and analyzed the relationship between fitting parameters and confining pressure, load amplitude, water content, and other variables [8]. Tang et al proposed a nonlinear creep model of GRS, which considers the accumulation of residual stress under the dynamic loading of subgrade combined with rheological theory and the creep behavior of GRS [24]. This model can better predict the creep characteristics of GRS under cyclic dynamic loading, but it is not well applied to more complicated situations, such as D-W cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observed that the stress-drop and strain increase in the tests were related to the residual strain caused by dynamic disturbance. Tang et al (2014) changed the average stress and the amplitude of disturbance load to explore the mechanical properties of marble under cyclic dynamic disturbance and high stress state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%