2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2019.8916969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic States Prediction in Autonomous Vehicles: Comparison of Three Different Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of the agent is to search an optimal sequence of control actions based on feedback from the environment. Owing to its characteristics of self-evaluation and self-promotion, RL is widely used in many research fields [28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: A Rl Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The goal of the agent is to search an optimal sequence of control actions based on feedback from the environment. Owing to its characteristics of self-evaluation and self-promotion, RL is widely used in many research fields [28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: A Rl Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 depicts the normalized average rewards of these three methods. Based on the definition of reward function in (27), higher reward indicates driving on the preferred lane with a more efficient maneuver. It is obvious that the training stability and learning speed of DDQN are better than the other two approaches.…”
Section: A Optimality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The decision-making module serves as the central intelligence hub within the autonomous driving system [3]. Its primary responsibility is to formulate appropriate motion behaviors tailored to specific missions within a dynamic and uncertain environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%