1982
DOI: 10.1049/ip-c.1982.0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic state estimation including anomaly detection and identification for power systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 6, for the first two seconds, the BD does not detect the anomaly since the obtained residuals are within the bounds defined by (12). As soon as this condition is not satisfied, i.e.…”
Section: ) Small Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As shown in Fig. 6, for the first two seconds, the BD does not detect the anomaly since the obtained residuals are within the bounds defined by (12). As soon as this condition is not satisfied, i.e.…”
Section: ) Small Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Parameter Identification F k , G k and Q are the parameters to be calculated online to evaluate the dynamic model shown in (11). Debs and Larson [13], credited with the seminal paper on DSE, and Nishiya et al [14] have assume a simple linear model with F k assumed to be an identity matrix and G k assumed to be zero. But this makes the estimator very simplistic and hampers the forecasting ability of the estimator [1].…”
Section: A Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time evolution of the state vector deviation is given by: £2 , fc+i _ F k cc k + tv k (10) where F k is a nonzero matrix with dimension (n x n); w k is a white Gaussian sequence with zero mean and covariance matrix Q k . Note that eqn.…”
Section: Dynamic Model II [6 8] (Dm-ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%